From: Franky V. L. <lie...@te...> - 2008-01-25 15:15:00
|
I already figured that out :-) I don't object to it myself, but it should be clear to the survey designer when creating his questions ... Franky On 1/25/08, Bishop Bettini <ph...@id...> wrote: > > I started with !other (yes, changing its label with !other=Foobarbaz), > but that wasn't what I needed ... unless I was mis-using it. > > As I understand it, !other allows you to add in write-in responses > **to a list of predetermined choices**. I don't want the respondent > to write in another choice, I want them to explain their choice. So, > in my case, I want to give them a list of say 5 options. I want to > require them to choose from that list. Then, I want to give them the > option of explaining their choice in greater detail. That explanation > is a follow-up to the first question, not a question that stands alone > of its own merit. > > Thoughts? > bishop > > > Quoting Matthew Gregg <mat...@gm...>: > > > It won't look like an essay question and may not be what you want but > > !other does something like this. Maybe you could expand that? > > > > On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 07:26 -0500, Bishop Bettini wrote: > >> Hi Franky, > >> > >> In my case, it's visual. Showing the follow-up question isn't > >> "conditional" on the previous answer, but rather allows "expansion" on > >> the previous answer. > >> > >> Like, suppose you have these two question: > >> > >> Please tell us how satisfied you were with our service: > >> ( ) Very satisfied > >> ( ) About usual > >> ( ) Very dissatisfied > >> > >> Please list any particular experiences you had that led you to that > >> response: > >> /----------------------\ > >> | | > >> | | > >> \----------------------/ > >> > >> > >> > >> The second question doesn't stand on its own -- it's answer is only > >> meaningful in light of the first answer. Similarly, the choice made > >> for the first answer doesn't drive whether to show the second > >> question: you always show it, but you want to visually indicate that > >> the essay box question "follows up" to the radio question. > >> > >> > >> Thoughts? > >> bishop > >> > >> > >> Quoting Franky Van Liedekerke <lie...@te...>: > >> > >> > Hi Bishop, > >> > > >> > doesn't conditions already foresee such a functionality (show a > question > >> > when the answer to a previous question meets some conditions)? Or is > this > >> > only a visual thing? > >> > > >> > Franky > >> > > >> > On 1/25/08, Bishop Bettini <ph...@id...> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> All, > >> >> > >> >> I've made the following modification to my local branch, but I > didn't > >> >> know if it was something the community wanted. If so, I'll commit > to > >> >> trunk. There's an example screen-shot attached. > >> >> > >> >> Issue 940: > >> >> In some scenarios, one question follows up another. For example, you > >> >> might ask to rate your experience with a particular subject, then > >> >> provide an open-ended justification for that rating. These aren't > >> >> logically "next" questions, and should not therefore be numbered as > >> >> such. They should also be visually "tied" the previous question, so > >> >> as to form a mental association between the two. Finally, these > >> >> aren't new question types, but a relationship between questions. > >> >> > >> >> Implement this by name sequencing. If this question name begins > with > >> >> exactly the same name as the previous question, it's a > follow-up. For > >> >> example "q1" followed by a "q1_comments" question will key that > >> >> "q1_comments" is a follow-up. There are, however, still two > separate > >> >> questions in the database. We are simply indicating the association > >> >> by the question names. > >> >> > >> >> bishop > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Bishop Bettini > >> >> ideacode, Inc. > >> >> (main) +1 919 341 5170 / (fax) +1 919 521 4100 > >> >> > >> >> Visit us on the web at: > >> >> ideacode.com Professional software research and development > >> >> reviewmysoftware.com Improve sales! Review your software before you > >> >> release > >> >> bytejar.com Solutions to those annoying development > problems > >> >> > >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > >> >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > >> >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> phpESP-devel mailing list > >> >> php...@li... > >> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpesp-devel > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > Bishop Bettini > ideacode, Inc. > (main) +1 919 341 5170 / (fax) +1 919 521 4100 > > Visit us on the web at: > ideacode.com Professional software research and development > reviewmysoftware.com Improve sales! Review your software before you > release > bytejar.com Solutions to those annoying development problems > > > |