From: Franky V. L. <lie...@te...> - 2008-01-25 14:32:59
|
and don't forget you can change the question generated by "!other" as well ... On 1/25/08, Matthew Gregg <mat...@gm...> wrote: > > It won't look like an essay question and may not be what you want but > !other does something like this. Maybe you could expand that? > > On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 07:26 -0500, Bishop Bettini wrote: > > Hi Franky, > > > > In my case, it's visual. Showing the follow-up question isn't > > "conditional" on the previous answer, but rather allows "expansion" on > > the previous answer. > > > > Like, suppose you have these two question: > > > > Please tell us how satisfied you were with our service: > > ( ) Very satisfied > > ( ) About usual > > ( ) Very dissatisfied > > > > Please list any particular experiences you had that led you to that > response: > > /----------------------\ > > | | > > | | > > \----------------------/ > > > > > > > > The second question doesn't stand on its own -- it's answer is only > > meaningful in light of the first answer. Similarly, the choice made > > for the first answer doesn't drive whether to show the second > > question: you always show it, but you want to visually indicate that > > the essay box question "follows up" to the radio question. > > > > > > Thoughts? > > bishop > > > > > > Quoting Franky Van Liedekerke <lie...@te...>: > > > > > Hi Bishop, > > > > > > doesn't conditions already foresee such a functionality (show a > question > > > when the answer to a previous question meets some conditions)? Or is > this > > > only a visual thing? > > > > > > Franky > > > > > > On 1/25/08, Bishop Bettini <ph...@id...> wrote: > > >> > > >> All, > > >> > > >> I've made the following modification to my local branch, but I didn't > > >> know if it was something the community wanted. If so, I'll commit to > > >> trunk. There's an example screen-shot attached. > > >> > > >> Issue 940: > > >> In some scenarios, one question follows up another. For example, you > > >> might ask to rate your experience with a particular subject, then > > >> provide an open-ended justification for that rating. These aren't > > >> logically "next" questions, and should not therefore be numbered as > > >> such. They should also be visually "tied" the previous question, so > > >> as to form a mental association between the two. Finally, these > > >> aren't new question types, but a relationship between questions. > > >> > > >> Implement this by name sequencing. If this question name begins with > > >> exactly the same name as the previous question, it's a > follow-up. For > > >> example "q1" followed by a "q1_comments" question will key that > > >> "q1_comments" is a follow-up. There are, however, still two separate > > >> questions in the database. We are simply indicating the association > > >> by the question names. > > >> > > >> bishop > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Bishop Bettini > > >> ideacode, Inc. > > >> (main) +1 919 341 5170 / (fax) +1 919 521 4100 > > >> > > >> Visit us on the web at: > > >> ideacode.com Professional software research and development > > >> reviewmysoftware.com Improve sales! Review your software before you > > >> release > > >> bytejar.com Solutions to those annoying development > problems > > >> > > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > > >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > > >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> phpESP-devel mailing list > > >> php...@li... > > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpesp-devel > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > |