You can subscribe to this list here.
2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(9) |
Nov
(85) |
Dec
(44) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2003 |
Jan
(63) |
Feb
(47) |
Mar
(25) |
Apr
(79) |
May
(58) |
Jun
(30) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(59) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(13) |
Dec
(3) |
2004 |
Jan
(21) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(51) |
Jul
(40) |
Aug
(16) |
Sep
(17) |
Oct
(24) |
Nov
(50) |
Dec
(78) |
2005 |
Jan
(41) |
Feb
(84) |
Mar
(26) |
Apr
(61) |
May
(48) |
Jun
(82) |
Jul
(66) |
Aug
(58) |
Sep
(23) |
Oct
(182) |
Nov
(61) |
Dec
(112) |
2006 |
Jan
(343) |
Feb
(149) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(71) |
May
(33) |
Jun
(46) |
Jul
(42) |
Aug
(55) |
Sep
(52) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(37) |
Dec
(14) |
2007 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(53) |
Apr
(25) |
May
(105) |
Jun
(6) |
Jul
|
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(22) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
2008 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
|
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(9) |
2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(9) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Lester C. <le...@ls...> - 2013-07-27 12:58:44
|
rob...@we... wrote: > Please take the 1.2.x nightly phpeclipse. Link is onwww.phpeclipse.com > This version is ready for PHP 5.3. That is the version I'm already running ... Lines like static::getDisplayUrlFromHash( are giving Parser error "';' expected after 'static' statement." ( The e_strict/depricated errors in PEAR don't help either, but not a lot we can do about that - I have an e_strict version, but have not addressed the use of 'var' in pear ) -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk |
From: <rob...@we...> - 2013-07-27 06:14:15
|
Please take the 1.2.x nightly phpeclipse. Link is on www.phpeclipse.com This version is ready for PHP 5.3. Robert |
From: Lester C. <le...@ls...> - 2013-07-26 20:49:17
|
How many people are still sing phpeclipse? I've been reinstalling my main development machine, and initially loaded PDT, but the features missing on that are more of a problem than the out of date bits in phpeclipse. I'm running on Kepler version of Eclipse without a problem, and have code that I've been working with for years working fine. However I need to attack a couple of bits that are giving errors I can't ignore when producing E_STRICT compliant code. The main one is 'static::' although some of the other distractions that have appeared in PHP probably need addressing as well such as Namespace. That is the only one I want to pick up in the short term. Can someone point me in the right direction to address the '::' parsing, to save me having to back through all the code again - been several years and I don't use java other than on phpeclipse :( The other niggle which I'm not so convinced about is smarty3 variations. At present I'm running smarty2, so the errors I'm seeing may just be my duff upgrading ;) Anybody confirm that the smarty highlighting is OK for S3? -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk |
From: Mike B. <mb...@bu...> - 2010-04-02 17:01:08
|
Good day folks! It's been a *very* cold winter for PHPeclipse here in the US... and to be fair, last summer was a bit cool as well. Most everyone has been busy with all manner of other "stuff"... be it Day Job(tm) or family or <insert other suff here>. At any rate, Mr Ed Mann and I have found that we're both going to be able to put some CPU cycles into the PHPeclipse project *this weekend*, the 3rd and 4th of April; so I thought perhaps it would be a good chance to see who else is keen get things moving again. I don't expect it to be a huge code weekend as much as some good solid house-keeping and a bit of active discussion and such. Things on the hot-list: * Nightly builds - Fix 'em! * Freshen the project homepage with some news and such... we're still not dead! * Comb the ticket list for dupes and support issues * Discuss migrating Trac back to sf.net * Catch up with old friends and make some new ones! ;-) Given that we're all geographically disparate and it's very last minute, the best bet is to just show up in #phpeclipse on irc.freenode.net and start talking @ people. Raise your concerns... idle, share ideas and let's see about getting the PHPeclipse band back together again! Hope to see you there! Mike. |
From: <ed...@ed...> - 2009-11-10 13:11:23
|
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 12:40:27 -0200, Charles Schaefer <cha...@gm...> wrote: > Hi, > I have, finally, finished the parser that generates syntax.xml for > different languages. > I'm sending it in attachment. The package has two file: > parse_manual.sh and parser.php. > > The script download the manual source from SVN, parses the necessary > files, and generates the final syntax.xml to the selected language. > > To use it: > $ ./parse_manual.sh {language} {syntax.xml path} > > For example, to generate the english version of the syntax file: > $ ./parse_manual.sh en syntax_en.xml > > > -- > Charles Schaefer > UaiTI (www.uaiti.com.br) > Email: cha...@gm... > ch...@ua... > Tels.: +55 31 9317-2862 > +55 31 3785-1118 > > ATENÇÃO: Não imprima este e-mail. A natureza agradece. E seu bolso também. > WARNING: Don't print this e-mail. The nature is thankful. And your money > too. Awesome thanks for this contribution to the project. |
From: Charles S. <cha...@gm...> - 2009-11-09 14:40:40
|
Hi, I have, finally, finished the parser that generates syntax.xml for different languages. I'm sending it in attachment. The package has two file: parse_manual.sh and parser.php. The script download the manual source from SVN, parses the necessary files, and generates the final syntax.xml to the selected language. To use it: $ ./parse_manual.sh {language} {syntax.xml path} For example, to generate the english version of the syntax file: $ ./parse_manual.sh en syntax_en.xml -- Charles Schaefer UaiTI (www.uaiti.com.br) Email: cha...@gm... ch...@ua... Tels.: +55 31 9317-2862 +55 31 3785-1118 ATENÇÃO: Não imprima este e-mail. A natureza agradece. E seu bolso também. WARNING: Don't print this e-mail. The nature is thankful. And your money too. |
From: Mike B. <mb...@bu...> - 2009-10-02 23:37:51
|
On 10/2/09 4:33 PM, Mauro C. wrote: > Hi to all, > > I just commit the fist refactored version of PHPEclipse. > > What I done: > > 1 - Separate UI from core plugin. > 2 - Import dom code from JDT (3.4.1) > 2 - some clean. > > I refer to 3.4.1 ver becouse ubuntu/debian distro start to package this. > > there are alot of errors (many about imported dom), but it run :-) > > know issues: > > 1 - Icons and label not replaced. > 2 - php code completation not works very well. > > now need to start to test it, and feedback issues. > > > thanks, > Mauro "Incastrix" Casciari > Well done old boy! Very nice! I'll see if I can take a look over the weekend... will let you know how I get on. Cheers, Mike. |
From: Mauro C. <inc...@ya...> - 2009-10-02 23:33:57
|
Hi to all, I just commit the fist refactored version of PHPEclipse. What I done: 1 - Separate UI from core plugin. 2 - Import dom code from JDT (3.4.1) 2 - some clean. I refer to 3.4.1 ver becouse ubuntu/debian distro start to package this. there are alot of errors (many about imported dom), but it run :-) know issues: 1 - Icons and label not replaced. 2 - php code completation not works very well. now need to start to test it, and feedback issues. thanks, Mauro "Incastrix" Casciari |
From: <ed...@ed...> - 2009-09-29 02:27:56
|
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:39:37 -0300, Charles Schaefer wrote: Hi all, I want to learn the PHPEclipse's code/architecture to help to fix and/or implement some features that would be useful for the daily development. Searching in the PHPEclipse's site, i've found the "Developers/Library" section, but there's nothing in it. There's someone working on this part. Would be very useful for that who want to help the dev team. Cheers -- Charles Schaefer UaiTI (www.uaiti.com.br [1]) Email: cha...@gm... [2] ch...@ua... [3] Tels.: +55 31 9317-2862 +55 31 3247-6207 ATENÇÃO: Não imprima este e-mail. A natureza agradece. E seu bolso também. WARNING: Don't print this e-mail. The nature is thankful. And your money too. Charles, Pages need a little work, but if you join the irc channel on freenode #phpeclipse we hang out there and the active guys can give you a heads up on what's going on and where is a good place to get started on fixing things. Just look for me and if i have time i will give you the help i can on getting into the src. Incastrix/mauroC is working on a new AST so allot of good will come of that. Anyway glade to see you are interested in the project. Sorry i could not offer more help that the advice i just gave. Thanks Links: ------ [1] http://www.uaiti.com.br [2] mailto:cha...@gm... [3] mailto:ch...@ua... |
From: Charles S. <cha...@gm...> - 2009-09-28 21:39:44
|
Hi all, I want to learn the PHPEclipse's code/architecture to help to fix and/or implement some features that would be useful for the daily development. Searching in the PHPEclipse's site, i've found the "Developers/Library" section, but there's nothing in it. There's someone working on this part. Would be very useful for that who want to help the dev team. Cheers -- Charles Schaefer UaiTI (www.uaiti.com.br) Email: cha...@gm... ch...@ua... Tels.: +55 31 9317-2862 +55 31 3247-6207 ATENÇÃO: Não imprima este e-mail. A natureza agradece. E seu bolso também. WARNING: Don't print this e-mail. The nature is thankful. And your money too. |
From: <ed...@ed...> - 2009-09-20 13:23:39
|
Hey everyone, some people have asked about email notification from tickets on trac. There are a few things that i did set, but some i did not. When you have time could you look over the list here -> http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracNotification and e-mail back the settings you think we should use. I will start with the following. 1. SMTP_ALWAYS_CC => PHPECLIPSE-DEVEL@LISTS.SOURCEFORGE.NET 2. ALWAYS_NOTIFY_OWNER => TRUE 3. SMTP_FROM => TRAC@PHPECLIPSE.COM All other input is welcome. Thanks. |
From: Lester C. <le...@ls...> - 2009-09-06 21:14:12
|
ed...@ed... wrote: > i guess it will take some time for them to get the robots.txt file. Until > then phpeclipse.com will be slow or down completely. > > However if i have configured the robots.txt or apache setup wrong let me > know. It looks fine - I found that it took a day or so for search engines to recheck robots.txt, but once they had done, they dropped into rechecking fairly quickly, and then would just re-read robots.txt every 24 to 48 hours ... -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk// Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php |
From: Keith R. <ke...@ka...> - 2009-09-06 18:44:25
|
Found this on using the rate limiting module. http://sancairodicopenhagen.com/joe/iptables_rate_limit_module Looks good. The comments in my example may not match the actual code, as I might have lowered the limits ;) Not done any firewall rules for a while! HTH Keith Roberts ----------------------------------------------------------------- Websites: http://www.php-debuggers.net http://www.karsites.net http://www.raised-from-the-dead.org.uk All email addresses are challenge-response protected with TMDA [http://tmda.net] ----------------------------------------------------------------- |
From: Keith R. <ke...@ka...> - 2009-09-06 15:42:27
|
On Sun, 6 Sep 2009, ed...@ed... wrote: > To: php...@li... > From: ed...@ed... > Subject: Re: [PHPEclipse-devel] Trac issues once again > > On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 07:32:23 +0100, Lester Caine <le...@ls...> > wrote: >> ed...@ed... wrote: >>> The msnbot has decided to index phpeclipse.com website. This is killing >>> the server and causing trac to consume all memory in the box. I have >>> given the box 3Gig of RAM, it worked for a while but now is being a >>> problem again. I have a few thoughts on solutions for this. (i did >>> enable a memory check we created some time ago to check the system >>> memory and if it fell below a level to kill all apache processes). >>> >>> 1. Put another server up and load balance the two. I would move trac >>> from using SQLite to PGSql so i could get both servers to read the >>> database, however this may be possible using sqlite and an nfs or iscsi >>> share. Input welcomed. >>> >>> 2. Move Trac website back to SF. They support trac now. Don't know how >>> much work this would be, and don't know if this is the correct solution. > >>> We may just be moving the problem around. >>> >>> 3. Move away from trac to some other tool that knows how to manage it's >>> memory. I have no idea on this one. >>> >>> 4. Just hope our little script works and leave it as is. >>> >>> That's all i have. Just let me know what you think would be a good >>> solution for this problem. Also the httpd processes consume huge amounts > >>> of CPU. I could give the box another CPU. I don't know how much that >>> would help. It would help, just how much of a help would it be? Input is > >>> wanted. >> >> Or just disable msnbot via robots.txt? >> >> Half the trouble seems to be that these search engines trawl EVERYTHING, >> so every historic link with the result that every single update has a >> search link created. >> At one point I had 60 search engines all trawling my server, once one of >> the big boys lists you, all of the others join the band wagon :( So >> although it would possibly be nice that a search on one of them produces >> a result - is the cost of supporting them in computer power and >> bandwidth worth it? >> >> My local machines simply has a deny all robots.txt, while the ones at >> 1&1 have just a few select ones allowed nowadays - and nofollow helps on >> and historic stuff >> http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/050118-204728 > > I have added a robots.txt file. It has the following content > User-agent: * > Disallow: /browser > Disallow: /log > Disallow: /changeset > Disallow: /report > Disallow: /newticket > Disallow: /search > > I also had to add the folloring to the conf file for phpeclipse domain > <Location "/robots.txt"> > SetHandler None > </Location> > > This is after the mod_python stuff. > > I checked this internal before i allowed the firewall to > pass traffic back to the site, and it worked. > > However i see the bot getting the robots.txt file > 65.55.209.70 - - [06/Sep/2009:09:36:52 -0500] "GET > /robots.txt HTTP/1.0" 200 126 "-" "msnbot/1.1 > (+http://search.msn.com/msnbot.htm)" Now i won't see that > host come around again, but i get the others 65.55.106.162 > - - [06/Sep/2009:09:51:47 -0500] "GET > /browser/trunk/net.sourceforge.phpeclipse/src/net/sourceforge/phpeclipse/phpeditor/php/HTMLCompletionProcessor.java?rev=117 > HTTP/1.0" 200 37604 "-" "msnbot/2.0b > (+http://search.msn.com/msnbot.htm)" 65.55.106.159 - - > [06/Sep/2009:09:51:48 -0500] "GET > /browser/trunk/net.sourceforge.phpeclipse.phpmanual.htmlparser/build.properties?rev=1582 > HTTP/1.0" 200 13347 "-" "msnbot/2.0b > (+http://search.msn.com/msnbot.htm)" 65.55.106.182 - - > [06/Sep/2009:09:51:49 -0500] "GET > /browser/trunk/net.sourceforge.phpeclipse.debug.core?rev=1441 > HTTP/1.0" 200 21769 "-" "msnbot/2.0b > (+http://search.msn.com/msnbot.htm)" > > i guess it will take some time for them to get the robots.txt file. Until > then phpeclipse.com will be slow or down completely. > > However if i have configured the robots.txt or apache setup wrong let me > know. You mentioned blocking msnbot at the firewall, which is a good idea. There's a way to limit requests via IPTables, that should work. It blocks connections according to the number of requests over a particualr time to a certain port, from a particular IP address. This is a general rule I wrote to stop any IP address from DOSing my site: #------------------------------------------------------# # chain to limit the average number of new Apache connections # to 20 per second. i.e. an average of 200 new connections # every 10 seconds - enough for me now! # this limit will kick in when limit-burst of 30 is reached! #------------------------------------------------------# iptables -N throttle_port_80 iptables -I throttle_port_80 -i eth0 -p tcp --syn --dport 80 \ -m limit --limit 5/second --limit-burst 10 -j ACCEPT See http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/187 for an intro to limiting connections with IPTables. For more info You can also search Google for: iptables limit I guess that restricting msnbot with a limit-based firewall rule would be your first line of defence. This should take the load off apache, and also allow normal users in OK. Writing apache rules to stop msnbot accessing parts of the site puts the load back onto apache, which is probably not the best choice. However, if you want to stop apache from serving certain parts of your site to msnbot as well, use a directory container like: <Directory /full/path/to/phpeclipse-site/directory/to/block> Options None Order deny,allow Deny from MSNBOT Allow from all </Directory> Where MSNBOT is the IP address(es) used by msnbot. Please see here: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mod_access.html#deny for full details of how to use the deny directive. HTH Keith Roberts ----------------------------------------------------------------- Websites: http://www.php-debuggers.net http://www.karsites.net http://www.raised-from-the-dead.org.uk All email addresses are challenge-response protected with TMDA [http://tmda.net] ----------------------------------------------------------------- |
From: Keith R. <ke...@ka...> - 2009-09-06 15:27:32
|
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009, ed...@ed... wrote: > To: Phpeclipse devel <php...@li...> > From: ed...@ed... > Subject: [PHPEclipse-devel] Trac issues once again > > > > The msnbot has decided to index phpeclipse.com website. > This is killing the server and causing trac to consume all > memory in the box. I have given the box 3Gig of RAM, it > worked for a while but now is being a problem again. I > have a few thoughts on solutions for this. (i did enable a > memory check we created some time ago to check the system > memory and if it fell below a level to kill all apache > processes). What about blocking msnbot from everything bar the homepage? Analyzing file http://www.phpeclipse.com/robots.txt No errors found in this robots.txt file You can find some warnings at the bottom of the analysis Hide empty and comments lines: on The following block of code DISALLOWS the crawling of the following files and directories: /browser /log /changeset /report /newticket /search to all spiders/robots. Line 1 User-agent: * Line 2 Disallow: /browser Line 3 Disallow: /log Line 4 Disallow: /changeset Line 5 Disallow: /report Line 6 Disallow: /newticket Line 7 Disallow: /search Line 8 WARNING: The tool has found some directory paths that don't include a trailing slash character. Since a missing trailing slash can be both a deliberate decision or an error, and since this tool can't ipotize the real intentions of the webmaster, here follow some clarifications that could prevent a potential problem: The following command will disable just the directory "private" and all its contents: Disallow: /private/ ...while the following command will disable both the "private" directory and any file or directory path starting with the text "/private" (so "/private-eye.html", "/privateroom/page.html", etc.): Disallow: /private Please be sure to use the correct syntax, according to your needs. Robots.txt Checker at: http://tool.motoricerca.info/robots-checker.phtml Kind Regards, Keith Roberts BTW. I have installed Fedora Eclipse and the PHPEclipse extension. I really like the added documentation for setting up debugging. I'm sure that will be a great help to new user of PHPEclipse :) > 1. Put another server up and load balance the two. I would > move trac from using SQLite to PGSql so i could get both > servers to read the database, however this may be possible > using sqlite and an nfs or iscsi share. Input welcomed. PostgreSQL requires text file dumps to backup the databases. Unlike MySQL where you can just stop the server and copy the databases directly to back them up. > 2. Move Trac website back to SF. They support trac now. > Don't know how much work this would be, and don't know if > this is the correct solution. We may just be moving the > problem around. > > 3. Move away from trac to some other tool that > knows how to manage it's memory. I have no idea on this one. > > 4. Just hope > our little script works and leave it as is. > > That's all i have. Just let me know what you think would > be a good solution for this problem. Also the httpd > processes consume huge amounts of CPU. I could give the > box another CPU. I don't know how much that would help. It > would help, just how much of a help would it be? Input is > wanted. > > Thanks. |
From: <ed...@ed...> - 2009-09-06 14:53:48
|
On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 07:32:23 +0100, Lester Caine <le...@ls...> wrote: > ed...@ed... wrote: >> The msnbot has decided to index phpeclipse.com website. This is killing >> the server and causing trac to consume all memory in the box. I have >> given the box 3Gig of RAM, it worked for a while but now is being a >> problem again. I have a few thoughts on solutions for this. (i did >> enable a memory check we created some time ago to check the system >> memory and if it fell below a level to kill all apache processes). >> >> 1. Put another server up and load balance the two. I would move trac >> from using SQLite to PGSql so i could get both servers to read the >> database, however this may be possible using sqlite and an nfs or iscsi >> share. Input welcomed. >> >> 2. Move Trac website back to SF. They support trac now. Don't know how >> much work this would be, and don't know if this is the correct solution. >> We may just be moving the problem around. >> >> 3. Move away from trac to some other tool that knows how to manage it's >> memory. I have no idea on this one. >> >> 4. Just hope our little script works and leave it as is. >> >> That's all i have. Just let me know what you think would be a good >> solution for this problem. Also the httpd processes consume huge amounts >> of CPU. I could give the box another CPU. I don't know how much that >> would help. It would help, just how much of a help would it be? Input is >> wanted. > > Or just disable msnbot via robots.txt? > > Half the trouble seems to be that these search engines trawl EVERYTHING, > so every historic link with the result that every single update has a > search link created. > At one point I had 60 search engines all trawling my server, once one of > the big boys lists you, all of the others join the band wagon :( So > although it would possibly be nice that a search on one of them produces > a result - is the cost of supporting them in computer power and > bandwidth worth it? > > My local machines simply has a deny all robots.txt, while the ones at > 1&1 have just a few select ones allowed nowadays - and nofollow helps on > and historic stuff > http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/050118-204728 I have added a robots.txt file. It has the following content User-agent: * Disallow: /browser Disallow: /log Disallow: /changeset Disallow: /report Disallow: /newticket Disallow: /search I also had to add the following to the conf file for phpeclipse domain <Location "/robots.txt"> SetHandler None </Location> This is after the mod_python stuff. I checked this internal before i allowed the firewall to pass traffic back to the site, and it worked. However i see the bot getting the robots.txt file 65.55.209.70 - - [06/Sep/2009:09:36:52 -0500] "GET /robots.txt HTTP/1.0" 200 126 "-" "msnbot/1.1 (+http://search.msn.com/msnbot.htm)" Now i won't see that host come around again, but i get the others 65.55.106.162 - - [06/Sep/2009:09:51:47 -0500] "GET /browser/trunk/net.sourceforge.phpeclipse/src/net/sourceforge/phpeclipse/phpeditor/php/HTMLCompletionProcessor.java?rev=117 HTTP/1.0" 200 37604 "-" "msnbot/2.0b (+http://search.msn.com/msnbot.htm)" 65.55.106.159 - - [06/Sep/2009:09:51:48 -0500] "GET /browser/trunk/net.sourceforge.phpeclipse.phpmanual.htmlparser/build.properties?rev=1582 HTTP/1.0" 200 13347 "-" "msnbot/2.0b (+http://search.msn.com/msnbot.htm)" 65.55.106.182 - - [06/Sep/2009:09:51:49 -0500] "GET /browser/trunk/net.sourceforge.phpeclipse.debug.core?rev=1441 HTTP/1.0" 200 21769 "-" "msnbot/2.0b (+http://search.msn.com/msnbot.htm)" i guess it will take some time for them to get the robots.txt file. Until then phpeclipse.com will be slow or down completely. However if i have configured the robots.txt or apache setup wrong let me know. |
From: Lester C. <le...@ls...> - 2009-09-06 06:32:40
|
ed...@ed... wrote: > The msnbot has decided to index phpeclipse.com website. This is killing > the server and causing trac to consume all memory in the box. I have > given the box 3Gig of RAM, it worked for a while but now is being a > problem again. I have a few thoughts on solutions for this. (i did > enable a memory check we created some time ago to check the system > memory and if it fell below a level to kill all apache processes). > > 1. Put another server up and load balance the two. I would move trac > from using SQLite to PGSql so i could get both servers to read the > database, however this may be possible using sqlite and an nfs or iscsi > share. Input welcomed. > > 2. Move Trac website back to SF. They support trac now. Don't know how > much work this would be, and don't know if this is the correct solution. > We may just be moving the problem around. > > 3. Move away from trac to some other tool that knows how to manage it's > memory. I have no idea on this one. > > 4. Just hope our little script works and leave it as is. > > That's all i have. Just let me know what you think would be a good > solution for this problem. Also the httpd processes consume huge amounts > of CPU. I could give the box another CPU. I don't know how much that > would help. It would help, just how much of a help would it be? Input is > wanted. Or just disable msnbot via robots.txt? Half the trouble seems to be that these search engines trawl EVERYTHING, so every historic link with the result that every single update has a search link created. At one point I had 60 search engines all trawling my server, once one of the big boys lists you, all of the others join the band wagon :( So although it would possibly be nice that a search on one of them produces a result - is the cost of supporting them in computer power and bandwidth worth it? My local machines simply has a deny all robots.txt, while the ones at 1&1 have just a few select ones allowed nowadays - and nofollow helps on and historic stuff http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/050118-204728 -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk// Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php |
From: <ed...@ed...> - 2009-09-06 04:39:02
|
The msnbot has decided to index phpeclipse.com website. This is killing the server and causing trac to consume all memory in the box. I have given the box 3Gig of RAM, it worked for a while but now is being a problem again. I have a few thoughts on solutions for this. (i did enable a memory check we created some time ago to check the system memory and if it fell below a level to kill all apache processes). 1. Put another server up and load balance the two. I would move trac from using SQLite to PGSql so i could get both servers to read the database, however this may be possible using sqlite and an nfs or iscsi share. Input welcomed. 2. Move Trac website back to SF. They support trac now. Don't know how much work this would be, and don't know if this is the correct solution. We may just be moving the problem around. 3. Move away from trac to some other tool that knows how to manage it's memory. I have no idea on this one. 4. Just hope our little script works and leave it as is. That's all i have. Just let me know what you think would be a good solution for this problem. Also the httpd processes consume huge amounts of CPU. I could give the box another CPU. I don't know how much that would help. It would help, just how much of a help would it be? Input is wanted. Thanks. |
From: Mauro C. <inc...@ya...> - 2009-08-26 02:17:32
|
>Da: "ed...@ed..." <ed...@ed...> >A: phpeclipse-devel@lists..sourceforge.net >Inviato: Martedì 25 agosto 2009, 14:54:49 >Oggetto: [PHPEclipse-devel] phpeclipse.com update > > >As many have read phpeclipse.com trac has had an update. I removed all the spam that was in the system that i found, also removed the accounts that went with the spam. The new system has akismet to filter posts to check for spam. I created an account on wordpress so i could get the api key. I will share that account info with select project members. >Another new feature of the 0.11 update is the blog system. Again select project members will have the ability to post to the blog system. If you don't have access and feel you should please contact me. >I updated the theme we were using for 0.10 to work on 0.11. I will submit it up the the maintainer for inclusion into the main project svn repo. I also used a patch on the blog system to get custom header level support. This patch was found in the projects ticket system. Discussion system was updated and several other modules that we use. >Hopefully the spam will stay down and we can focus on supporting our user base and working on PHPEclipse. > >Any questions/comments please send them to the list. Build of 1.2.x fails. Mauro Casciari |
From: <ed...@ed...> - 2009-08-25 13:18:52
|
As many have read phpeclipse.com trac has had an update. I removed all the spam that was in the system that i found, also removed the accounts that went with the spam. The new system has akismet to filter posts to check for spam. I created an account on wordpress so i could get the api key. I will share that account info with select project members. Another new feature of the 0.11 update is the blog system. Again select project members will have the ability to post to the blog system. If you don't have access and feel you should please contact me. I updated the theme we were using for 0.10 to work on 0.11. I will submit it up the the maintainer for inclusion into the main project svn repo. I also used a patch on the blog system to get custom header level support. This patch was found in the projects ticket system. Discussion system was updated and several other modules that we use. Hopefully the spam will stay down and we can focus on supporting our user base and working on PHPEclipse. Any questions/comments please send them to the list. |
From: Mauro C. <inc...@ya...> - 2009-08-23 02:25:07
|
Great job Ed! thanks. Mauro "Incastrix" Casciari |
From: Keith R. <ke...@ka...> - 2009-07-29 16:33:20
|
Is this anything to do with Eclipse's code completion? Might be worth checking out the preferences for PHPEclipse's code completion. Regards, Keith Roberts ----------------------------------------------------------------- Websites: http://www.php-debuggers.net http://www.karsites.net http://www.raised-from-the-dead.org.uk All email addresses are challenge-response protected with TMDA [http://tmda.net] ----------------------------------------------------------------- On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, wo...@su... wrote: > To: php...@li... > From: wo...@su... > Subject: [PHPEclipse-devel] $_GET insertion when hitting enter > > When using PHPEclipse, often times when I press return at the end of a > line, "$_GET" is appended to the end of the line, then the cursor begins a > new line. The problem happens intermittently. I've tried to establish > exactly what circumstances cause this to happen, but cannot. It doesn't > happen each time I hit enter, or half of the time, otherwise it would be a > severe annoyance. It seems it most likely occurs when I hit return after > typing an open brace character when starting an if-block or function. > Thanks > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ > PHPEclipse-devel mailing list > PHP...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpeclipse-devel > |
From: <wo...@su...> - 2009-07-29 13:45:59
|
When using PHPEclipse, often times when I press return at the end of a line, "$_GET" is appended to the end of the line, then the cursor begins a new line. The problem happens intermittently. I've tried to establish exactly what circumstances cause this to happen, but cannot. It doesn't happen each time I hit enter, or half of the time, otherwise it would be a severe annoyance. It seems it most likely occurs when I hit return after typing an open brace character when starting an if-block or function. Thanks |
From: <wo...@su...> - 2009-07-13 16:36:11
|
> I was able to update to Galileo. I have one machine running PHPEclipse > on it. I still have another one to update. I also tried the discussion > link and it's working for me. I will have others check. I would like to > know the error you got while trying to install PHPEclipse on Galileo. > > Thanks. Today when I tried I had no problems. Last week when I tried, and I pasted in http://update.phpeclipse.net/update/stable/1.2.x, it said nothing could be found there. I read there are issues using the same workspace with Eclipse 3.5, so just to be sure I will start another. Probably the .project file can stay in each of the source directories for each project. I'd like to get preferences from the old workspace but I didn't change much from the default. Thanks |
From: Edward M. <ed...@ed...> - 2009-07-11 21:38:22
|
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 10:34 -0400, wo...@su... wrote: > I had difficulty getting PHPEclipse to load into the new eclipse version. > I couldn't remember how I loaded it the last time, but used help, install > new software (or something like that), and pasted in: > http://update.phpeclipse.net/update/stable/1.2.x. I don't have Galileo > anymore so I can't go back and look. When I did it this way it said > something wasn't found. Has anyone migrated to the latest eclipse version > and loaded PHPEclipse? > > I tried the new PHP package for eclipse that's shown on the eclipse site. > It comes with PDT. I tried PDT once before and got an error whenever I > tried to start a project with a folder containing PHP files. A similar > error still happens with what I just tried. I prefer PHPEclipse, anyway. > > At the phpeclipse.com website the forum link is broken. I would have > posted my question to more of a user oriented forum, but it doesn't work: > http://dev.phpeclipse.com/discussion. Thanks > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, > vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have > the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize > details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge > _______________________________________________ > PHPEclipse-devel mailing list > PHP...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpeclipse-devel I was able to update to Galileo. I have one machine running PHPEclipse on it. I still have another one to update. I also tried the discussion link and it's working for me. I will have others check. I would like to know the error you got while trying to install PHPEclipse on Galileo. Thanks. |