Yeah, I went back and forth on PEAR vs. adodb. There are a few reasons
to choose adodb over PEAR, but (for me, anyway) performance wasn't one
of them. I downloaded the benchmarks used by the adodb crew to show
adodb is faster than any other abstraction library. When running them
on my setup, I found that with 200 select queries, PEAR was less than a
second slower that adodb. Not a huge performance difference. What it
really came down to, though, was my main goal of having phpbt be easy to
install. By using PEAR instead of adodb, that's one less thing someone
would have to download to get up and running.
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 08:41:03PM +0100, Javier Sixto wrote:
> Since a few month i was searching for the more efficient and popular DB
> connection class, and ADODB was this ... :-)
> PEAR was imature and compared to PHPlib and others, it was the slowest.
> But perhaps PEAR as changed since ???
>
> I doesn't know :-P
>
>
>
> Ben Curtis wrote:
>
> >Be cautious with the latest changes I just committed... they aren't
> >tested much. Also, I haven't yet written the script to convert the old
> >sequence style to the PEAR::DB style, so if you do want to test it you
> >will probably want to test it with a new installation. Good luck, and
> >let me know if you have any problems with it!
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >phpbt-dev mailing list
> >php...@li...
> >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpbt-dev
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> phpbt-dev mailing list
> php...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpbt-dev
|
