Re: Tags you plan to support/how to add more

[Dan K. (Seek3r) <da...@ku...>]

I still cant get this darn code to work. I installed php on windows (for
the binary) and it wont work.

In the mean time I have started my own mini parser using your tag
format.

Seek3r

Michel Dänzer wrote:
> 
> "Dan Kuykendall (Seek3r)" wrote:
> 
> > > I think the parser is the part of the code which needs the most work. It has a
> > > few bugs which are hard if not impossible to fix with the current approach.
> >
> > I still havent really been able to get it to run for me from a browser
> > (my only option at this point. But since the code is so small its not
> > that hard to learn.
> 
> Is there really no way you can install a PHP binary?
> 
> > > > @generic copyright [GPL/LGPL/BSD]
> > > > @generic package  [appname]
> > > > @generic access       [public or private]
> > > > @generic syntax [CreateObject('app.class', 'constructor_params'); ]
> > > > @generic example [$phpgw->acl = CreateObject('phpgwapi.acl');]
> > >
> > > Sounds like a great idea for those that don't require any special treatment,
> > > others should be tags of their own IMHO.
> >
> > Thats the thinking
> 
> Alright, which is which? Here's a proposal:
> 
> var: new tag
> 
> copyright: meta
> 
> package: could be handled via directories?
> 
> access: meta (Only document public vars?)
> 
> syntax: Necessary? (anything missing from the function summaries?)
> 
> example: new tag, needs pretty-printing
> 
> What else?
> 
> > > This reminds me of HTML meta tags so what does everyone think about @meta? (or
> > > @info? ...)
> >
> > Would this be used in the actual HTML header?
> 
> Hadn't thought of that... If it's useful, why not?
> 
> > > Great! We're excited to hear that our code is useful and there is interest in
> > > further development.
> >
> > Has the project been dead?
> 
> Let's say seriously ill. ;) We haven't had as much time to work on it as we
> wished...
> 
> > I notice cvs activity stopped about 10 months ago
> 
> Yep, until the 0.1.1 release recently. BTW the changes on the 0.1 branch
> haven't been merged into the trunk yet.
> 
> > > PS: If I'm not mistaken, our company is looking into using phpGroupWare...
> >
> > Very cool. Let me know if you need anything.
> 
> I'll tell the people working on it, thanks.
> 
> --
> Michel Dänzer           |      Relog-Reagency AG      |        http://relog.ch
> Weinbergstrasse 108     |         8006 Zürich         |     +41 (0)1 368 55 55
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PHP...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpautodoc-devel