Hi,
> through it but I think there is a problem with
> sf.net.
it should work, if the message is plain ASCII. You
could even post to the list w/o beeing subscribed, but
the message must be readable.
> several tomcat instances behind apache and use load
> balancing capabilities of mod_jk. So we will have
Why mod_jk? Since Tomcat version 5 load balancing is
build into tomcat.
In version 2.0.6 the bridge used a similar algorithm
as mod_jk's. But this feature was switched off in the
release and was dropped in 2.0.7 in favor of real
Tomcat 5 clustering. -- Although it is possible to add
"load balancing" to the adapter, it doesn't belong
there as it is difficult or impossible to add
different scheduling algorithms or properly maintain
the list of live nodes.
Isn't it possible to set up tomcat5 load balancing?
http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2004/04/14/clustering.html?page=2
Since the php instances appear to tomcat as ordinary
internet clients, this should work without problems.
Regards,
Jost Boekemeier
___________________________________________________________
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de
|
