<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<img alt="uneasiness"
src="cid:par...@sh..." height="300"
width="356"><br>
You can see, I think, why I wrote the other day that SCO was asking the
Delaware court to re-decide an issue that had already been decided. If
they were really interested in finality and certainty, we wouldn't heard
Mr.<br>
Robinson, the judge in the SCO v.<br>
The two are severable in that sense.<br>
And here's how much of that is now being held by SCO.<br>
As part of the transaction, Novell assigned the UNIX and UNIXWARE
trademarks to The Santa Cruz Operation.<br>
Novell, on our Transcripts page, to make them easier to find. By then,
there was no Santa Cruz Operation, only Tarantella and what had been
Caldera but had changed its name by then to The SCO Group.<br>
They'll have a claim and here's how we'll deal with their claim as well
as everybody else's, okay.<br>
We have to have a resolution.<br>
And here's how much of that is now being held by SCO. I've seen quit
claim deeds and personality quit claim deeds type in realty. So, the
real issue Novell argues next is timing, and it said it needed its
claims to be determined "expeditiously".<br>
In other words, what remains for determination in the District Court
Action are, in essence, damage calculations on an already successful
action for Novell. And second, I've gone through the motion briefs and
the hearing transcript to pick out for you the essential bits to make it
as clear as possible as to what each side was asking for and who
won.<br>
That's where we would be if you lifted the stay.<br>
Jacobs just talked to us about. This story isn't over. They failed to
notice that the registered owner is not The SCO Group, but the Santa
Cruz Operation of California, and despite all the card tricks, that
isn't the same thing at all.<br>
</body>
</html>
|
