perlunit-users

[Perlunit-users] Greetings!

[Robert K. <rku...@ob...>]

So, question 1.  Anyone out there...?

Question 2.  I played a bit with Test::Unit awhile ago and quite liked 
it.  I thought I read once there is/might be integration of  Test::Unit 
with Test::More or Test::Harness?

The reason I ask both questions is because like many (some?) I am 
feeling the need to add automated testing to my good development habits 
so I am doing some test module shopping.  I like the way Test::Unit 
worked but Test::More and Test::Harness seem to be the "standard" way in 
the Perl community. 

Thus I am torn.  If Test::Unit has been abandoned then that may answer 
my question for me.  On the other hand, if maintenance/advancement 
continues and Test::Unit test scripts can easily be incorporated with 
Test::Harness, etc. then I would much rather be liking that...

Robert Kuropkat

Re: [Perlunit-users] Greetings!

[Andrew A. <aa...@ma...>]

RK> So, question 1.  Anyone out there...?

I guess so.

RK> Question 2.  I played a bit with Test::Unit awhile ago and quite liked
RK> it.  I thought I read once there is/might be integration of  Test::Unit
RK> with Test::More or Test::Harness?

Test::Unit::HarnessUnit. It's a test runner which outputs in the same format
that Test::Harness expects.
Look at http://search.cpan.org/src/ASPIERS/Test-Unit-0.24/t/assert.t

RK> The reason I ask both questions is because like many (some?) I am
RK> feeling the need to add automated testing to my good development habits
RK> so I am doing some test module shopping.  I like the way Test::Unit
RK> worked but Test::More and Test::Harness seem to be the "standard" way in
RK> the Perl community.

RK> Thus I am torn.  If Test::Unit has been abandoned then that may answer
RK> my question for me.  On the other hand, if maintenance/advancement
RK> continues and Test::Unit test scripts can easily be incorporated with
RK> Test::Harness, etc. then I would much rather be liking that...

Test::Unit is abandoned in some way, but it still work. %)

aa29