Re: [Perlunit-devel] Class::Inner

[Piers C. <pdc...@bo...>]

Philip King <em...@ch...> writes:

> Seems pretty sketchy for Unit::Test to depend on 0.1
> software (Class::Inner).  There has been *one* release,
> and that was over a year ago.  Come on, folks...
>
> Here is my "make test" for Class::Inner.
> PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/local/bin/perl -Iblib/arch
> -Iblib/lib -I/usr/lib/perl/5.6.1
> -I/usr/share/perl/5.6.1 -e 'use Test::Harness
> qw(&runtests $verbose); $verbose=0; runtests @ARGV;'
> t/*.t
> t/basic.............FAILED tests 1-13
>                            Failed 13/13 tests, 0.00%
>                            okay
>
> Failed	13 out of 13 tests!  No thanks, sticking with
> older versions of Unit::Test.

You know, I'm always somewhat bemused by those tests failing. Whenever
I run the tests under 5.6.1 installation of perl the tests pass with
flying colours. What version of Test::More do you have installed.

> (At what point in the enhancements of Unit::Test was it
> determined that an alpha implementation of inner classes
> was necessary???)

When we spun the internal Unit::Test Inner Class implementation off
into a standalone package.

-- 
Piers

   "It is a truth universally acknowledged that a language in
    possession of a rich syntax must be in need of a rewrite."
         -- Jane Austen?