Re: [Perlunit-devel] (no subject)

[Adam S. <ad...@sp...>]

Piers Cawley (pdc...@bo...) wrote:
> Adam Spiers <ad...@sp...> writes:
> >Piers Cawley (pdc...@bo...) wrote:
> >> Well, it's sort of dependent on where you run the script from.
> >> Actually I'm more inclined to stick the *modules* in t/tlib (I'll
> >> explain why it has to be tlib in a minute) and then do 
> >> 
> >>     use lib 't/tlib', 'tlib';
> >> 
> >> So that you can run the tests from either the project root or from
> >> inside the t directory. It has to be tlib instead of lib to avoid
> >> using the files in lib/* rather than blib/*.
> > 
> > Yep, sounds good.  It doesn't look like there's any hook in MakeMaker
> > so we could persuade it to add these to @INC directly, hmph.  Although
> > doing it that way would break running the tests directly (isn't that
> > deprecated however?)
> 
> Dunno about deprecated, it can be damned useful.
> 
> > I can do this right now if you want me to.
> 
> Go to it.

Done and committed.  Tests all pass for me; hope I haven't broken
anything.