Re: [Perlunit-devel] PDC_REFACTOR merged back

[Piers C. <pdc...@bo...>]

Adam Spiers <ad...@sp...> writes:

> Piers Cawley (pdc...@bo...) wrote:
>> Adam Spiers <ad...@sp...> writes:
>> > Piers Cawley <pdc...@bo...> wrote:
>> >> Seemed to go in smoothly. If you'd all like to do a 'get' of the
>> >> main line into a virgin directory and run the tests (to make
>> >> sure that everything went in okay...) and report back.
>> > 
>> > Works great for me, although I did cvs update -A rather than a
>> > fresh checkout. Since then I've been committing to HEAD rather
>> > than the branch, so you won't have to do any more merging.
>> 
>> Can you do a fresh checkout anyway, just for me. I've been bitten
>> occasionally by having files in my local copy that weren't actually
>> in CVS so things continued to work after 'cvs update -A', but
>> didn't work for some poor schmuck who checked the thing out fresh.
> 
> I use PCL-CVS under emacs (highly recommended), which amongst other
> things makes it trivial to keep an eye out for files which should be
> checked in but aren't. However for our peace of mind I've just done
> a fresh checkout and it's all good.

I really must learn PCL-CVS properly. I use it but in a desultory
fashion. 

-- 
Piers

   "It is a truth universally acknowledged that a language in
    possession of a rich syntax must be in need of a rewrite."
         -- Jane Austen?