Re: [Perlunit-devel] the old 'ok' chestnut

[Hans D. <han...@us...>]

I think you're at risk that youre co-workers will keep using the ok() tests=
 instead of the $self->assert.
I think they better write th ok wrapper themselves, instead of providing it=
 if they want to keep the ok.
 

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

>Bearing in mind that (hopefully) in the future there will be lots of
>porting from Test to Test::Unit going on, it's probably worth making
>the transition as painless as possible.  To that end, I'm adding an
>ok() wrapper to do this to the PDC_REFACTOR branch.  That's not
>unreasonable is it?  I can mention in the pod that it's best only used
>during porting, not for writing tests from scratch.
>



_

  Greetings,
  Hans Donner