Re: [perldoc2-developers] datase vs. versioning
Status: Pre-Alpha
Brought to you by:
joergen_lang
From: Robert 'p. S. <rs...@47...> - 2006-12-12 09:59:32
|
Hi Joergen, Joergen W. Lang wrote: > Specifically there is one point I did not think of: > > There should be versioning/a backup facility for the translations. Which > more or less means a combination of a database-based storage for recent > versions and a SVN repository (which we already have!) as a > "backend-backend". (...unless we wanted to re-implement versioning > within the DB.) Well, if we're going to keep the structure and contents in the database, versioning isn't _that_ much to add. It would also keep everything in one place and backups should include the versioning IMO. > Generic/Specific Framework > > The focus should stay on the translation of the perl documentation for 5 > and 6. If there is a chance to build it so it allows future extensions > for other languages - fine. If not we should not worry too much. I don't see anything that would hinder other uses, except we start hardcoding stuff. > Pootle appeared to promising but didn't want to install on my > Debian/Sarge machine without a kernel change or a lot of manual > instllation. Or does it make more sense to just use that? I'm still not > 100% sure. What did it need _that_ for? gr., Robert -- # Robert 'phaylon' Sedlacek # Perl 5/Catalyst Developer in Hamburg, Germany { EMail => ' rs...@47... ', Web => ' http://474.at ' } |