Re: [perldoc2-developers] [RFC] Platform Specification Vs. 0.1

[herbert b. <dei...@we...>]

allright, here my cents

#####################
- interface(s)
#####################

so we do it as webapp not desktop, that would be fine since im also involved in several other projects and a tranlation helper is something totally different than the pod viewer i want to build anyway.

#####################
- people
#####################

so we have admins that create and maintain the platform
and 

translators that can be assigned to a whole language a document or as reviewer
more seems to complex for me

sidenote: please don't compare our reviews with wikipedias peer review because wp is
a hack of a mess. sometimes it works well but that depends on subject, weather, 
astrological circumstances and other darker forces, because there is nearly everything 
open. i like to have here a more restricted culture, even if it should be for *ANYONE*
should be as easy as possible to make comments on any translated passage, that can be
considered later by the assigned translators.


#####################
Multiple formats
#####################

we are perl hacker with CPAn on our side so converter tools should be least problem.

#####################
Meta information
#####################

thats no enough, take me for instace, es i wrote my czech is sophisticated but containes
some terrible orthographical flaws (some people here claim that is also true for my german *g* ). such infos i like to atach on a doc that an revisor don't have to search for flaws i know there are at certain words or word group. 
so only mark a block or whole sentences as fuzzy would'nt do it IMO.

in much i agree with robert

so far

herbert