Re: [Perl-workflow-devel] Moose?

[Alejandro I. <ai...@p2...>]

On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Kaare Rasmussen <ka...@ja...> wrote:
> Hi Alex
>
>> This way current users have a choice whether to use Standard or
>> REST-based, whoch would be a complete port/re-write. Things we do on
>
> As I understand it, backwards compatibility is a very high priority for
> Workflow. If you want to include Moose and start rewriting tings, it may be
> better to start all over with a clean slate. That includes the most difficult
> task of all: Finding a new name!! ;-)

But I see no problem in using the same Workflow namespace!

Jonas,

Would you have a problem of a RESTful branch of Workflow in the
Workflow namespace? Something like Workflow::REST ?

My rationale is that instead of forking it would be better to work
collaboratively with the existing Workflow project and community, but
use separate namespace, we could even use the same subversion repo in
a different branch.