Re: [Perl-workflow-devel] Moose?

[Kaare R. <ka...@ja...>]

Hi Alex

> This way current users have a choice whether to use Standard or
> REST-based, whoch would be a complete port/re-write. Things we do on

As I understand it, backwards compatibility is a very high priority for 
Workflow. If you want to include Moose and start rewriting tings, it may be 
better to start all over with a clean slate. That includes the most difficult 
task of all: Finding a new name!! ;-)

I'd be interested in doing a bit of brainstorming, as I may be in need for a 
sleeker Workflow engine (or just a state machine), but I think it may be off 
topic here.

-- 

Med venlig hilsen
Kaare Rasmussen, Jasonic

Jasonic                 Telefon: +45 3816 2582
Nordre Fasanvej 12
2000 Frederiksberg      Email: ka...@ja...