Re: [Perl-workflow-devel] Moose?
Brought to you by:
jonasbn
From: Alejandro I. <ai...@p2...> - 2011-01-31 14:03:56
|
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Alejandro Imass <ai...@p2...> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Andrew O'Brien <an...@or...> wrote: >> Hi Alejandro, >> [...] > > Hi Andrew, > > I could agree on the dependencies but I don't think there would be a [...] > persistence onto the CPAN more easily. And finally, the WF code in > general is aging and perhaps a good time to re-evaluate some code > design and architectural choices as well. Maybe an HTTP/Resource based > approach with JSON data ala CouchDB ? Could be a branch/fork as well. > Maybe Workflow::REST ??? This way current users have a choice whether to use Standard or REST-based, whoch would be a complete port/re-write. Things we do on the REST version could be ported to Standard with Mouse, or even wrap Standard WF with MooseX::NonMoose as an intermediate step, or something along those lines. -- Alex |