Re: [Perl-workflow-devel] Can't get grouped actions
Brought to you by:
jonasbn
|
From: Andrew O'B. <an...@or...> - 2009-04-26 23:53:19
|
Hi Ivan,
We have exactly the same type set in the workflow.xml as in our
associated actions.xml.
Ie given a workflow "helpdesk" and the following files:
wf_helpdesk.xml
wf_helpdesk_action.xml
wf_helpdesk_condition.xml
.. Each of these files has a <type>helpdesk</type> entity.
As far as I under stand the config structure, that's almost required but
if not, it certainly saves a lot of confusion.
In that case you could just call ->type() and use it directly which I
believe is the way things should be set up.
Can anyone else comment whether setting the same type value in all files
for a worklog is The Way Things Are Supposed To Be?
Cheers,
Andrew
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ivan Paponov [mailto:iva...@gm...]
> Sent: Saturday, 25 April 2009 5:40 PM
> To: Andrew O'Brien; per...@li...
> Subject: Re: [Perl-workflow-devel] Can't get grouped actions
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Thanks for your answer.
>
> I didn't have time to work over that issue earlier, but now I would
> like to fix it. Here are my thoughts about it.
>
> We have action types (didn't pay much attention it it before
> actually), so that means line in
> State.pm, which I submitted in group patch, won't work.
> That one:
> my $action_group =
> FACTORY->{_action_config}{$action_name}{'group'};
>
> (Actually I'm still wondering why it worked in 0.31)
> So we need to change it to something like
> my $type = exists $some_type ? $some_type : 'default';
> FACTORY->{_action_config}{$type}{$action_name}{'group'}
>
> So where can we find that $some_type variable?
> In state we have $self->type() which is workflow type, but I need
> clarification here - how does workflow type corresponds with action
> types?
> Actually, when I look at the XML structure of <workflow> it's
> clear that I have
> workflow, with some type, and number of actions that are it's
> children. And it's clear without action type definition.
> But actually it's not clear in script, because all actions go under
> 'default' key, but not not under 'Workflow type' key.
>
> So, here is my main question, where I can find action type variable in
> State.pm? And should I mark all actions in my_type_workflow.xml with
> workflow type?
> (I don't mind my_type_actions.xml here, because State.pm doesn't work
> with it at all, and actions are taken from my_type_workflow.xml file)
>
> >> From: Ivan Paponov [mailto:iva...@gm...]
> >> Sent: Monday, 2 March 2009 10:37 AM
>
>
> > Hi Ivan,
>
> >> Recently, I updated workflow 0.31 to 1.32 and I faced with
> one problem
> >> in my system. Links that were connected to actions disappeared. I
> >> didn't have much time to go deep into debugging, but here is what I
> >> found for now.
> >>
> >> I retrieve actions with get_current_actions($group) function.
> >> It refers to get_available_action_names($self,$group), which
> >> is in State.pm
> >> I analyzed that function, and I found that
> >> my $action_group =
> FACTORY->{_action_config}{$action_name}{'group'};
> >> returns nothing.
> >> So, I looked at FACTORY->{_action_config} and found out that all
> >> actions are under 'default' key. I added that key:
> >> my $action_group =
> >> FACTORY->{_action_config}{'default'}{$action_name}{'group'};
> >> And my action links returned on the screen.
>
> > Each of your action, condition and top-level workflow files need to
> > define the <type> parameter - One of the other developers here was
> > bitten by this a while back :-)
>
> > Eg:
>
> > my_type_here.xml:
> > <workflow type="my_type_here">
> > ...
> > </workflow>
>
> > my_type_here_action.xml:
> > <action>
> > <type>my_type_here</type>
> > ...
> > </action>
>
> > Etc.
>
> > Then things should work as expected. The hash key is the
> workflow type
> > from memory which defaults to 'default' if not set.
>
> > Cheers,
>
> > Andrew
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Ivan Paponov
> iva...@gm...
>
>
|