From: Robert M. <rm...@po...> - 2006-05-13 15:12:35
|
Dear hackers, Please the announcement from the SourceForge Team, copied verbatim below. Main points: (1) Web access to CVS is now: http://perl-win32-gui.cvs.sourceforge.net/perl-win32-gui/Win32-GUI/ (2) Anyone who has checked out source will need to do create a new working copy using perl-win32-gui.cvs.sourceforge.net as the host rather than the old cvs.sourceforge.net If you have any problems, then reply to this mail on this list, and we'll try to sort them out together. Regards, Rob. --- Begin Included Message --- Greetings, You are receiving this mail because you are a project admin for a SourceForge.net-hosted project. One of our primary services, CVS, suffered a series of interrelated, critical hardware failures in recent weeks. We understand how frustrating this CVS outage must be to you and your users; however, our top priority remains preservation of the integrity of your data. The series of CVS hardware failures prompted us to expedite the deployment of planed improvements to our CVS infrastructure, drawing upon much of the knowledge that we gained from our Subversion deployment. Our improved CVS service architecture, which we plan to deploy tomorrow afternoon (2006-05-12), will offer greater performance and stability and will eliminate several single points of failure. The Site Status page (https://www.sf.net/docs/A04) will be updated as soon as the new infrastructure is rolled out. In the interim, please read the important information provided below to learn about how these changes will affect your project. Summary of changes, effective 2006-05-12: 1. Hostname for CVS service Old: cvs.sourceforge.net New: PROJECT_UNIX_NAME.cvs.sourceforge.net This change will require new working copies to be checked out of all repositories (so control files in the working copy will point to the right place). We will be updating the instructions we supply, but instructions that your team has written within documentation, etc. will need to be updated. cvs -d:pserver:ano...@cv...:/cvsroot/gaim co gaim would be changed to cvs -d:pserver:ano...@ga...:/cvsroot/gaim co gaim 2. ViewCVS We are moving from ViewCVS to its successor, ViewVC. ViewVC is currently in use for our Subversion service. 3. Sync delay Old: CVS pserver, tarballs and ViewCVS provided against a separate server which is a minimum of three hours behind developer CVS. New: ViewVC will be provided against developer CVS (it will be current). CVS pserver will be provided against a secondary server (not developer server) with a maximum expected delay of two hours. Follow-up work is planned (this infrastructure takes us 80% of the way) to essentially eliminate the sync delay. 4. Read-only rsync service As a new service offering, we are now providing read-only rsync access against developer CVS. This allows projects to efficiently make on-demand backups of their entire CVS repository. All projects should be making regular backups of their CVS repository contents using this service. 5. Nightly tarball service Nightly tarball service is being dropped in lieu of read-only rsync service. Projects which currently depend on nightly tarballs for repository backups will need to begin using rsync to make a backup copy of their repository contents. We see this as a major functional improvement. For a number of reasons, tarballs have fallen out of sync with the data in the repository at times in the past few years. Tarballs required a substantial amount of additional disk, and I/O to generate. The move to read-only rsync allows backups to be produced on-demand, with an update frequency chosen by the project. 6. Points of failure In the past, developer CVS service for all projects was provided from a single host. CVS pserver service was provided from individual backend heads based on a split of the data. Under our new design, developer CVS and most of our CVS-related services are provided from one of ten CVS hosts (count subject to increase with growth). Each host is independent, and makes a backup copy of the repository data of another host (which is used to provide the pserver CVS service). Failure of a single host will impact only the availability of data on that host. Since the data is split among a larger number of hosts, the size of data impacted by an individual host outage is substantially smaller, and the time required for us to restore service will be substantially shorter. This rapid architecture change has been made possible specifically using the research we performed for our recent launch of Subversion service. We've applied our best practices, produced a substantial amount of internal documentation, and kept an eye toward maintainability. This effort has allowed us to deploy this new architecture quickly once hardware was received, and will permit us to quickly scale this service horizontally as growth and demand requires. Many other minor improvements have also been made to improve the service offering and make it less trouble-prone. The most important of which are listed above. For a full description of the new service offering, and for information on how to use the services described above, please refer to the site documentation for the CVS service after the service has been launched: https://www.sf.net/docs/E04 Thank you, The SourceForge.net Team --- End Included Message --- -- Robert May Win32::GUI, a perl extension for native Win32 applications http://perl-win32-gui.sourceforge.net/ |
From: Robert M. <rm...@po...> - 2006-05-17 20:10:52
|
Glenn Linderman wrote: > ... but what about > backups? I'd be happy to backup Win32::GUI's CVS if there is a Windows > rsync that I can use to do it... unless you have already set up > something. I already investigated, and found cwRsync http://www.itefix.no/cwrsync/ that seems to do the job. I'll be doing sporadic backups (as I have been doing under the previous regime with the tarballs, and for the website, Wiki and tracker data ...) - but I'd be very happy to know someone else was doing it too. > Maybe, to cover vacations and such, more than one backup location should > be created. I'm not sure that we're active enough that vacations etc, are a problem. Although I haven't looked into it yet, I could easily have a cron job do a backup daily. Multiple locations is definitely a good idea, and if you're happy to look into this then please go ahead. Thanks, Rob. |
From: Robert M. <rm...@po...> - 2006-06-03 10:22:25
|
Glenn Linderman wrote: > On approximately 5/17/2006 1:10 PM, came the following characters from > the keyboard of Robert May: >> Glenn Linderman wrote: >>> ... but what about backups? I'd be happy to backup Win32::GUI's CVS >>> if there is a Windows rsync that I can use to do it... unless you >>> have already set up something. >> >> I already investigated, and found cwRsync >> http://www.itefix.no/cwrsync/ > > Do you have a command line that does the job that you could share as a > starting point for creating my own command line? I just followed the instructions at: https://sourceforge.net/docs/E04/en/#rsync which led me to having the following .bat file (adjust paths as necessary; last line may wrap - it's supposed to be one line only): @echo off rem backup the perl-win32-gui sourceforge CVS repository rem into the current directory C:\PROGRA~1\cwRsync\bin\rsync -av rsync://perl-win32-gui.cvs.sourceforge.net/cvsroot/perl-win32-gui/* . Thanks, Rob. |
From: darrik <da...@my...> - 2006-06-03 20:36:57
|
Glenn Linderman wrote: > On approximately 6/3/2006 3:22 AM, came the following characters from > the keyboard of Robert May: >> Glenn Linderman wrote: >>> On approximately 5/17/2006 1:10 PM, came the following characters from >>> the keyboard of Robert May: >>>> Glenn Linderman wrote: >>>>> ... but what about backups? I'd be happy to backup Win32::GUI's CVS >>>>> if there is a Windows rsync that I can use to do it... unless you >>>>> have already set up something. >>>> I already investigated, and found cwRsync >>>> http://www.itefix.no/cwrsync/ >>> Do you have a command line that does the job that you could share as a >>> starting point for creating my own command line? >> I just followed the instructions at: >> https://sourceforge.net/docs/E04/en/#rsync >> >> which led me to having the following .bat file (adjust paths as >> necessary; last line may wrap - it's supposed to be one line only): >> >> @echo off >> rem backup the perl-win32-gui sourceforge CVS repository >> rem into the current directory >> C:\PROGRA~1\cwRsync\bin\rsync -av >> rsync://perl-win32-gui.cvs.sourceforge.net/cvsroot/perl-win32-gui/* . >> >> Thanks, >> Rob. > > OK, that was relatively simple. I modified the script a bit so I'll > keep one backup per day-of-the-week so the script chooses the directory > for the day of the week, and then does your command. So I'll always > have 7 copies, generally from the last 7 days, and, no doubt, often > redundant when not much is happening. But only when I'm not on > vacation, so there will be some sporadic behaviour then, when some of my > backups could be older... it is part of my bootup-first-time-each-day > script. If it's helpful, I have a linux server running 24/7 at my house, so I can automate a daily backup and keep them as far back as it suits you guys (as I'm not in any danger [yet] of filling the 800GBs of disk space on it). ;) I'll set that up Monday at first opportunity. Darrik Mazey |
From: Robert M. <rm...@po...> - 2006-06-05 23:01:57
|
darrik wrote: > Glenn Linderman wrote: >> I'll >> keep one backup per day-of-the-week so the script chooses the directory >> for the day of the week, and then does your command. So I'll always >> have 7 copies, generally from the last 7 days, and, no doubt, often >> redundant when not much is happening. But only when I'm not on >> vacation, so there will be some sporadic behaviour then, when some of my >> backups could be older... it is part of my bootup-first-time-each-day >> script. > > If it's helpful, I have a linux server running 24/7 at my house, so I > can automate a daily backup and keep them as far back as it suits you > guys (as I'm not in any danger [yet] of filling the 800GBs of disk space > on it). ;) > > I'll set that up Monday at first opportunity. That'd be great. If you'd be willing to automate backing up some other stuff, then drop me a line, and we'll work out what we should be backing up, and how often. Regards, Rob. |