perl-win32-gui-hackers

[perl-win32-gui-hackers] Which CVS branch are we supposed to use?

[Stephen P. <Ste...@uc...>]

Hi,

Now there's a CVS branch for 670 and 665-Fix. Which one are we meant to =
commit to? Which one contains the latest code? Shouldn't we make the 670 =
branch the one we're all meant to commit to now?

Steve

Re: [perl-win32-gui-hackers] Which CVS branch are we supposed to use?

[Jez W. <je...@je...>]

Which CVS branch are we supposed to use?Humm - good point.=20

I've been using the 665-fix branch to build the latest code line. I've =
just had a look and there have been no changes to 670 - so 665-fix is =
the latest code line. Although in theory, 670 should be the latest.

I guess it comes down to how Aldo wants to handle code releases? My =
personal viewpoint is that there should be new builds on a regular =
basis, with=20
"everyone" contributing to the latest code line.=20

jez.

  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Stephen Pick=20
  To: Win32 GUI Hackers (E-mail)=20
  Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 12:45 PM
  Subject: [perl-win32-gui-hackers] Which CVS branch are we supposed to =
use?


  Hi,=20

  Now there's a CVS branch for 670 and 665-Fix. Which one are we meant =
to commit to? Which one contains the latest code? Shouldn't we make the =
670 branch the one we're all meant to commit to now?

  Steve=20

Re: [perl-win32-gui-hackers] Which CVS branch are we supposed to use?

[Laurent R. <ro...@cl...>]

Which CVS branch are we supposed to use?Hi,

    I continue to commit on 665-Fix branch. Latest sourcecode is on this
branch.
    Win32-GUI-0_0_670 is a tag on Win32-GUI-665-Fix branch.

    Main branch it's keep for next Aldo code base.

Laurent.

> Now there's a CVS branch for 670 and 665-Fix. Which one are we meant to
commit to? Which one contains the latest code? Shouldn't > we make the 670
branch the one we're all meant to commit to now?