From: Jez W. <je...@je...> - 2004-03-28 17:10:31
|
Agreed. I was thinking that we should have a set of simple examples for = each control (toolbar.pl, listview.pl, listview2.pl, rebar.pl etc). As = well, as complete applications, such as the notepad suggestion.=20 As a summery: * All code commented * No hardcoded constants=20 * Use methods, not send message * Only use NEM (?). Cheers, jez. ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Laurent ROCHER=20 To: Jez White ; guihackers=20 Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 4:48 PM Subject: Re: [perl-win32-gui-hackers] Examples for future builds I think we need to keep caution than sample must be commented, well = designed and don't show bad thing ;o) I suggest not have hard coded constant or strange -style option, = replace sendmessage by standard method (if availlable)... We probably need small basic sample and more complex sample. Why not rewrite notepad or program like that in Win32::GUI perl as = demonstration ? It's interresting for complex sample and usefull for test Win32:::GUI. Laurent. ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Jez White=20 To: guihackers=20 Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 3:25 PM Subject: [perl-win32-gui-hackers] Examples for future builds Hi, Laurent has created a directory under CVS for examples that will be = included in future builds of the new code line. I was thinking of committing some examples today - but was wondering = if there is any formal process I should adhere to? I'm also going to ask = for examples from the users mailing list, so hopefully we'll get a large = varied collection together. Thoughts? jez. |