From: Jan D. <ja...@ac...> - 2009-05-05 17:00:12
|
On Tue, 05 May 2009, Rob May wrote: > 2009/5/4 Jan Dubois <ja...@ac...>: > Thanks - According to the "spec" > (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa374191(VS.85).aspx) the > processorArchitecture attribute is optional. If omitted I think it > would mean all architectures. I'm pretty sure I've also seen > processorArchitecture="*" - but can't find any examples/documentation > immediately. > > I'll work out a suitable course of action and modify the manifest/ add > _manifest.PL as appropriate. If processorArchitecture="*" works, then that would be the preferred solution, as it would even work in corner cases like building 32-bit modules on 64-bit Windows. > Many thanks for the feedback. Might this be a candidate for inclusion > in libwin32 (or whatever that's become)? libwin32 doesn't exist anymore as a distribution; all modules are individually packaged on CPAN now. We do have a lib...@pe... mailing list, and the http://libwin32.googlecode.com repository though. The Win32API::File and Win32API::Registry modules are maintained elsewhere though, and Win32::API (which was not part of libwin32 before) is now included in the libwin32 project. You are welcome to add your Win32::VisualStyles module to the project as well; just send me a Google recognized email address (Gmail, Gtalk, Google docs etc) and I'll add you to the project to give you write access to the subversion repository. Cheers, -Jan |