Hi,
At 12:04 AM 6/6/2001 +0800, Gunther Birznieks wrote:
>I think this is reasonable.
>
>I Don't know about Widget::Select since it is meant to be an abstract class
>and not actually instantiated itself. So it's a bit odd. Perhaps
>
>Widget::Base::Select would be better to make it clear that anything under
>Base direectory is an abstract skeleton of widgets that will belong under
>Widget::HTML or Widget::WML or what have you.
Yes. I like this (and reiterated it in my earlier recommendation).
Stephen
>At 09:23 PM 6/5/01 +1000, Cees Hek wrote:
>
>>I have a concern with the current structure of the base
>>classes. Currently the way I see it, the structure is as follows
>>
>>Widget::Base - base class for all widgets
>>Widget::HTML::Base - base class for all HTML widgets (inherits Widget::Base)
>>Widget::HTML::Select - a widget class (inherits from Widget::HTML::Base)
>>
|
