perl-ldap-dev

Web site

[Chris R. <chr...@ma...>]

I've been doing some updating of the web site :

    <http://perl-ldap.sourceforge.net/>

(eg the documentation link now points to CPAN, and is thus always up to
date) but if there's anything not there that folks think should be there,
please say!

Cheers,

Chris

Re: Web site

[Graham B. <gb...@po...>]

On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 04:02:04PM +0000, Chris Ridd wrote:
> I've been doing some updating of the web site :
> 
>     <http://perl-ldap.sourceforge.net/>
> 
> (eg the documentation link now points to CPAN, and is thus always up to
> date) but if there's anything not there that folks think should be there,
> please say!

Excellent,

Thanks Chris

Graham.

Re: Web site

[Jim H. <ha...@us...>]

Chris,
  In general, things look great.  Here are a few Nits:

The Introduction says 'LDAP will be an integral part of .. Netscape ONE and
... Exchange 5.0'.  This is outdated.  Netscape hardle exists and ONE is a Sun
product.  Exchange is currently 5.5.  That statement should be replaced by
something like: LDAP interfaces exist for a growing number of major software
products.

The 'LDAP Web Resources' and 'Other' should be made consistent with the
equivalent sections in the FAQ.

  --Jim Harle

On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Chris Ridd wrote:

> I've been doing some updating of the web site :
>
>     <http://perl-ldap.sourceforge.net/>
>
> (eg the documentation link now points to CPAN, and is thus always up to
> date) but if there's anything not there that folks think should be there,
> please say!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open!
> Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and
> the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
> http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en
>

Re: Web site

[Chris R. <chr...@ma...>]

On 13/3/03 7:55 pm, Jim Harle <ha...@us...> wrote:

> Chris,
> In general, things look great.  Here are a few Nits:
> 
> The Introduction says 'LDAP will be an integral part of .. Netscape ONE and
> ... Exchange 5.0'.  This is outdated.  Netscape hardle exists and ONE is a Sun
> product.  Exchange is currently 5.5.  That statement should be replaced by
> something like: LDAP interfaces exist for a growing number of major software
> products.

Good point, I've reworded it somewhat.

> The 'LDAP Web Resources' and 'Other' should be made consistent with the
> equivalent sections in the FAQ.

Yes, but I don't really want to just duplicate things. (The FAQ's on the web
site too.)

I'll review that bit of the FAQ and that section of the home page when I've
got a moment.

> --Jim Harle

Cheers,

Chris