That might have been one of them, but I think there was something about
determing whether something was structural or auxilary.
Mark
On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, Graham Barr wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 08:40:22AM -0500, Mark Wilcox wrote:
> > The reason why there isn't any schema stuff yet is because we need a
> > couple of methods added to the Net::LDAP::Schema module (can't remember
> > off the top of my head what they are,:( ).
>
> I think you wanted the ability to pass just the Net::LDAP::Entry, which
> you can now do.
>
> Graham.
>
> > If you want to tackle schema in DSML, go right ahead. I thought I would be
> > doing more with DSML by now but other projects keep getting in the way.
> >
> > Mark
> >
> > On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, Roman Baumer wrote:
> >
> > > I've just tried out the Net::LDAP::DSML package. Then I found out there is now
> > > way to unload the Schema to the dtd at the moment. I'm a very newby in DSML
> > > (who's not?), but my perl style should not be very bad. Therefore, if one of you
> > > need any help, I probably can take the time to support you in the DSML stuff.
> > >
> > > Roman
> > >
> >
> >
>
|
