----- Forwarded message from Jim Dutton <ji...@ws...> -----
Return-Path: <po...@mu...>
Received: (from pobox@localhost)
by monty.mutatus.co.uk (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f5LKkGB48447
for gbarr; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 21:46:16 +0100 (BST)
(envelope-from pobox)
Received: from dolly2.pobox.com (dolly2.pobox.com [208.210.125.92])
by monty.mutatus.co.uk (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f5LKkBU48434
for <po...@mu...>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 21:46:15 +0100 (BST)
(envelope-from ji...@ws...)
Received: from dolly2 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by dolly2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9137E25EE1
for <po...@mu...>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 16:47:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ws179149.56kdialup.siu.edu (ws179149.56kdialup.siu.edu [131.230.179.149])
by dolly2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE6B225F12
for <gb...@po...>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 16:47:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by ws17903.56kdialup.siu.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id f5K4acZ00701
for gb...@po...; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 04:36:38 -0820 (GMT)
Message-Id: <200...@ws...>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 04:36:37 +0000 (CDT)
From: Jim Dutton <ji...@ws...>
Reply-To: ji...@si...
Subject: anonymous bind with "empty" DN and passwd? (perl-ldap-0.22)
To: Graham Barr <gb...@po...>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii
It appears that attempting to perform/request an annonymous bind while
supplying "empty" DN and password parameters causes a bind failure.
Using no parameters succeeds with an annonymous bind, but I am
interested in using a static model that allows me to fill in the DN and
password parameters as needed, but still affect an annonymous bind
without having to include extra code and a seperate bind statement.
Thank you.
----- End forwarded message -----
|
