Re: ldap sorted question

[Roger B. <rj...@oc...>]

Graham,

Is this multivalued topic also related to the searchfilter you can pass
through?
ie.  filter => "(cn[1])",  as in my example?

You said it would be possible, so it isn't currently supported? If it
is, what's the right suffix, cos this surely isn't it...

If it isn't supported than I would surely rate this as a valueble
addition...

greetings,

Roger

Graham Barr wrote:
> 
> Currently the ->sorted method sorts using the order of values
> returned from the server. However it would be possible to support
> a suffix notation like you suggest.
> 
> Graham.
> 
> On Sun, Jun 23, 2002 at 02:03:31PM +0200, Roger Beulen wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > maybe this already has been answered before but I couldn't find it:
> >
> > when I use the  [ ATTR_LIST ] ) method, you can sort the results by the
> > attributes given in ATTR_LIST.
> >
> > We have a multivalued attribute CN consisting of:
> > Juan de Marco
> > Marco J, de
> > de Marco
> >
> > Is it possible that I want to have it sorted on the second value, Marco
> > J, de?
> > In a normal situation it would be sorted(cn) , but do I need to approach
> > it like an array in my case now? For example sorted(cn[1]) ?
> >
> > Any help would be welcome,
> >
> > greetings,
> >
> > Roger Beulen
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________
> >
> > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
> > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________________________
> 
> Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
> August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm