From: Graham B. <gb...@po...> - 2002-06-05 13:31:38
|
Currently the ->sorted method sorts using the order of values returned from the server. However it would be possible to support a suffix notation like you suggest. Graham. On Sun, Jun 23, 2002 at 02:03:31PM +0200, Roger Beulen wrote: > Hello, > > maybe this already has been answered before but I couldn't find it: > > when I use the [ ATTR_LIST ] ) method, you can sort the results by the > attributes given in ATTR_LIST. > > We have a multivalued attribute CN consisting of: > Juan de Marco > Marco J, de > de Marco > > Is it possible that I want to have it sorted on the second value, Marco > J, de? > In a normal situation it would be sorted(cn) , but do I need to approach > it like an array in my case now? For example sorted(cn[1]) ? > > Any help would be welcome, > > greetings, > > Roger Beulen > > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm > |