From: Chris R. <chr...@me...> - 2002-04-30 13:25:30
|
Graham Barr <gb...@po...> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 01:59:58PM +0100, Chris Ridd wrote: >> Here's another example of a tricky DN that might be worth testing: >> >> distinguishedNameTableKey=cn\=DSA\, c\=GB, cn=bilateral table, cn=DSA, >> c=US > > canonical_dn turns that into > > DISTINGUISHEDNAMETABLEKEY=cn\3dDSA\2c c\3dGB,CN=bilateral > table,CN=DSA,C=US > > Graham. > Looks about right. If we want to be *really* awkward, we could have multiple nested DNs. dntk=dntk\=cn\\=DSA\\,c\\=GB\,dc\=example\,dc\=com,dc=foo,dc=net Assuming I've got all the quoting right :-) Cheers, Chris |