From: Kjetil T. H. <kje...@li...> - 2002-04-08 22:54:10
|
Bing Du <du...@mo...> writes: > The schema says: > > attributetype ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.4391.0.303 NAME 'majorSuppress' > SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.7 ) > > Comparing with other attribute definitions, I noticed that this one > did not have 'EQUALITY' or 'SUBSTR' or ... as specificed in others. > Wondering if this was the cause of the problem that comparison did > not work. I believe it depends on the LDAP server you're using, that is, what is the default matching rule? OpenLDAP supports booleanMatch, but that matching is not part of RFC 2252. as a workaround, caseExactIA5Match should work just as well. I'm not an expert, though. :-) Kjetil T. |