Re: schema format questions

[Chris R. <chr...@me...>]

Peter Marschall <pet...@ma...> wrote:
> I warned you, it is very rough ;-)
> More a very dirty kludge than a patch.
> Its a unified diff againts perl-ldap 0.25 and atleast the
> part in LDAP.pm violates the RFC that defined the
> "vendorName" attribute in the roodDSE.

RFC 3045, I think.

> The RFC vedorName must not be used to change the
> behaviour of applications. A better solution might be to
> defined a global ldap option "alternate_schema_parser".

I think we should just have one parser that only uses the attributeTypes
(etc) attributes, but modified so that it works with these odd values
(which as is pointed out later on, are technically legal.)

Cheers,

Chris