From: Graham B. <gb...@po...> - 2001-10-29 18:15:30
|
I have made the release without the change. We can always give the patch tho those who ask Graham. On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 05:31:35PM -0000, Chris Ridd wrote: > Graham Barr <gb...@po...> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 05:00:29PM -0000, Chris Ridd wrote: > >> Graham Barr <gb...@po...> wrote: > >> > Did anyone else try this ? > >> > > >> > I know it is a hack, but do others think we should include it ? > >> > > >> > Graham. > >> > >> I'd personally prefer for IO::Socket::SSL to be corrected. > > > > Sure, but do we work around it in the meantime ? > > Yeah, why not. > > > Maybe I just include it as a patch > > I'd be inclined not to, as these may or may not get installed depending on > how alert the installer is. > > It doesn't matter too much. I'm not too bothered either way. > > > Graham. > > Cheers, > > Chris > |