Re: Additional VLV Problem

[Chris R. <chr...@me...>]

Graham Barr <gb...@po...> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 08:11:17AM +0100, Chris Ridd wrote:
>> "David A. Pinkowitz" <dpi...@un...> wrote:
>> > At 06:33 PM 6/7/01 +0100, Graham Barr wrote:
>> >> Your server did not return a VLV_RESPONSE control
>> >> 
>> >> It should have passed back a control which holds info about
>> >> where the entries returned are in the list.
>> > 
>> > Is this typically a server configuration issue or would it just be that
>> > the server does not support these controls?  Could I have done
>> > something wrong prior to making my search? It seems odd that the
>> > server could recognize the VLV control and return the correct data,
>> > but not generate the VLV_RESPONSE.  Thanks again for all your help.
>> 
>> The server is free to ignore any controls that are not marked as
>> 'critical'. You may want to create it this way and see what happens:
> 
> A VLV control is critical by default, unless specified. So this should
> not make a difference.
> 
> Graham.

I just looked at VLV.pm and you're right.

Cheers,

Chris