Re: Additional VLV Problem

[Graham B. <gb...@po...>]

On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 08:11:17AM +0100, Chris Ridd wrote:
> "David A. Pinkowitz" <dpi...@un...> wrote:
> > At 06:33 PM 6/7/01 +0100, Graham Barr wrote:
> >> Your server did not return a VLV_RESPONSE control
> >> 
> >> It should have passed back a control which holds info about
> >> where the entries returned are in the list.
> > 
> > Is this typically a server configuration issue or would it just be that
> > the server does not support these controls?  Could I have done something
> > wrong prior to making my search? It seems odd that the server could
> > recognize the VLV control and return the correct data, but not generate
> > the VLV_RESPONSE.  Thanks again for all your help.
> 
> The server is free to ignore any controls that are not marked as
> 'critical'. You may want to create it this way and see what happens:

A VLV control is critical by default, unless specified. So this should
not make a difference.

Graham.

> 
> $vlv = Net::LDAP::Control::VLV->new(
>            before => 0,    # No entries before target entry
>            after => 1,     # number of entries after target entry
>            content => 0,   #If set to 0, list size is unknown
>            offset => 1,    # Target entry is the first
>            critical => 1   # Return an error if VLV is not permitted
> );
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Chris