From: Graham B. <gb...@po...> - 2001-06-07 15:49:11
|
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 03:09:21PM +0100, Steve Haslam wrote: > On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 09:51:23AM -0400, Jim Harle wrote: > > This from a year old posting on this list that I had saved. Does anyone > > know if things are better with 5.6.1? My recollection was that the > > problems were mostly with mult-threaded installations of 5.6. Is that > > correct? > > 5.6.1 generally seems to be more stable than 5.6.0. I've not used > Net::LDAP much with it, though. But where I have it's worked fine... Yes 5.6.1 is much better, but I would still stay away from using threaded-perl. > hmm, can Net::LDAP do things like setting UTF8-ness on strings passed > to/from an LDAPv3 server? I get the impression it's not trivial to do > in pure Perl, though :| Right, it is not trivial. And in 5.7.x this is one area that is being worked on a lot. So I really dont want to do anything 5.6 specific. In 5.7 there is and Encode module. Although I only see Net::LDAP using this to get the octets of a value that has been passed and has been tagged as utf8. I don't think it will (yet ayway) be tagging the strings as they come back as it does not know which values are utf8 and which are not (eg a jpeg) Graham. |