From: Chris R. <chr...@me...> - 2001-05-03 16:01:56
|
"Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Ku...@Op...> wrote: > At 02:39 AM 5/3/01, Chris Ridd wrote: >> I *suspect* you are meant to ignore any options on the add/delete/replace >> line. Anyone else? > > Actually for any: > > add: FOO > BAR: xxxx > > > FOO should be equivalent to BAR. What do you mean by "equivalent" - BAR must be a subtype of FOO? Cheers, Chris |