From: Kurt D. Z. <Ku...@Op...> - 2000-11-29 17:33:02
|
At 05:15 PM 11/29/00 +0000, Chris Ridd wrote: >"Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Ku...@Op...> wrote: >> BTW, OpenLDAP 2.x provides an LDAPv3 implementation. >> >> At 10:46 AM 11/29/00 +0000, Chris Ridd wrote: >>> OK, that's not the way LDAP does it really. LDAPv3 servers store schema >>> in special places called subentries in the directory, and places >>> pointers (ie DNs) to those subentries in the subschemaSubentry attribute >>> in the root DSE. >> >> Every entry should have a subschemaSubentry attribute whose value >> refers to the subschema entry (or subentry) which controls it. > >Whilst that is true (it is actually an operational attribute) I didn't >describe that mechanism because it didn't appear to fit in with what Javier >was doing. I thought Javier was attempting to discover the schema controlling an entry. The general method for discover such is to obtain the controlling schema from the subschema subentry referred to by the entry's subschemaSubentry attribute. The Root DSE approach is known to be seriously flawed and, IMO, should be avoided until the IETF determines how to fix it. Kurt |