Re: RELEASE: perl-ldap 0.22

[Chris R. <chr...@me...>]

Graham Barr <gb...@po...> wrote:
> But it was Netscape who annoyed my by calling thiers perldap, as perl-ldap
> had already existed for a long-ish time.

Fair enough then. I note that perldap hasn't been updated for quite a while
now, so if we wait long enough it'll all be moot.

> No, it's just my spelling :)
> 
>> It kind of bugs me when I see it,
>> which I'm coming to think is a darn good way of making me fix scripts
>> which use deprecated (sic) methods :-)
> 
> :-)

Righto then! I was going to offer a little patch but on second thoughts...

> Graham.
> 
> PS: We probably should start thinking of removing some of the methods that
> have been deprecated for a long time.

A policy of removing stuff that's been deprecated in a release <= 0.10
different from the current one would be OK in my view.

Cheers,

Chris