From: Mark W. <mew...@un...> - 2000-09-08 14:18:13
|
That might have been one of them, but I think there was something about determing whether something was structural or auxilary. Mark On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, Graham Barr wrote: > On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 08:40:22AM -0500, Mark Wilcox wrote: > > The reason why there isn't any schema stuff yet is because we need a > > couple of methods added to the Net::LDAP::Schema module (can't remember > > off the top of my head what they are,:( ). > > I think you wanted the ability to pass just the Net::LDAP::Entry, which > you can now do. > > Graham. > > > If you want to tackle schema in DSML, go right ahead. I thought I would be > > doing more with DSML by now but other projects keep getting in the way. > > > > Mark > > > > On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, Roman Baumer wrote: > > > > > I've just tried out the Net::LDAP::DSML package. Then I found out there is now > > > way to unload the Schema to the dtd at the moment. I'm a very newby in DSML > > > (who's not?), but my perl style should not be very bad. Therefore, if one of you > > > need any help, I probably can take the time to support you in the DSML stuff. > > > > > > Roman > > > > > > > > |