Re: 'diff' for Net::LDAP entries

[Graham B. <gb...@po...>]

On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 11:25:25PM +0100, John Berthels wrote:
> > Just one point. We might want to allow the attribute names to be passed
> > and default to the union of the attributes in $new and $old if
> > not specified.
> 
> I don't see wht not. But would that mean deleting any unmentioned
> attributes or leaving unchanged? (Or are both potentially useful and
> selectable? Or is that making one func do too much?)

I would say the passed list would be the list of attributes to consider.
ie ignore/don't change all others. 

Graham.