From: Mark E. W. <mew...@un...> - 2000-07-19 04:46:08
|
set your scope to one. Mark On Wed, 19 Jul 2000, David Bussenschutt wrote: > As a slight aside, is there any way to search an ou without searching > sub-ou's ? > ...ie a non-recursive or non-decending search? > > eg return all objects of type X in "ou=div,o=org" but not include objects > from > in "ou=dept, ou=div, o=org" ? > > David. > > At 05:01 PM 7/18/00 -0400, Jim Harle wrote: > >If you know a branch in which to look, use that for the base instead of > >pointing the base to the top of your tree. E.g., > > base => "ou=dept, ou=div, o=org" > >instead of > > base => "o.org" > > > > --Jim Harle > > US Naval Academy > > > > > >On Tue, 18 Jul 2000, Graham Barr wrote: > > > >> ----- Forwarded message from Kaouass Rachid <rka...@br...> ----- > >> > >> Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 10:50:15 +0200 > >> From: Kaouass Rachid <rka...@br...> > >> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.2-RELEASE i386) > >> To: gb...@po... > >> Subject: Net::LDAP > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I am an new developper in LDAP, but I don't understand one thing : > >> Why does the search method look in all the tree, instead of I give her a > >> branche where to look ? sorry my english is not perfect :) > >> But I don't understand the fact Ldap look in all the tree for something > >> ? > >> > >> Tanks :) > >> -- > >> Rachid Kaouass > >> > >> Yep! > >> > >> ----- End forwarded message ----- > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > David Bussenschutt Email: D.B...@ma... > Senior Computing Support Officer & Systems Administrator/Programmer > Location: Griffith University. Information Technology Services > Brisbane Qld. Aust. (TEN bldg. rm 1.33) Ph:(07)38757079 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > ------------------------------------------------- Mark Wilcox mew...@jo... Campus Wide Information Systems Coordinator University of North Texas |