From: Graham B. <gb...@po...> - 2000-07-03 19:43:53
|
On Mon, Jul 03, 2000 at 12:12:12PM -0700, Allen, Robbie wrote: > > The biggest problem with this is that it makes your life > > easier because you have a paged controls on your LDAP Server. But my > server > > doesn't use paged controls, instead it supports the Virtual List View > control. > > I was just using the Paged control as an example. The search method, > could and probably should use VLV because of its acceptance. I think Mark has a point. Where do we stop ? how many controls do we try to integrate, how big do we allow ->search() to get, how much of this will be bloat for the many ? > > In other words I think it's a bad idea because: > > 1) it violates the idea behind the use of LDAP controls > > I don't see it as violating, I see it as integrating. And we know where that will get you :) Graham. |