From: Graham B. <gb...@po...> - 2000-06-12 10:21:11
|
On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 02:59:28PM +0100, Hd...@DT... wrote: > On Fri, 9 Jun 2000, Chris Ridd wrote: > > > I recall seeing a note from Graham somewhere saying that this was OK. > > Just copy the contents of the 'lib' directory (not the directory > > itself) to where your perl gets site-specific modules from. > > Thanks. I extracted the files from the tarball and noticed the documentation > contained an FAQ. In there I found the same info. Wow, someone read the FAQ :) > > Straight to Graham would be best, unless the changes are controversial > > in any way. (Fixing typos isn't too controversial though.) > > OK, I'll check if the typos are still in the Net::Utils. If so, I'll send a > diff file to Graham. Well I have been having problems with mail since Friday, so if you have sent it I ahve not got it yet. > First I need to rewrite a whole lot of scripts that used the older version. As > it is now the new install has broken them. I need to find out what precisely > has changed an get them up and running again before I do anything else (just > hope that won't be too much work). 'Till then I've reverted back to the > previously installed package as that worked flawlessly for me (even though I > had to do some workarounds to prevent problems in some of the more peculiar > situations). Well some people see it as a bad thing that Net::LDAP is still changing this much, but other see it as good. But then Net::LDAP is still very early in it's life and trying to find direction. Even though it has now been around for over two years. Hopefully with more people being interested and contributing Net::LDAP can find it's direction and settle down. Who knows we may someday release version 1.00 :) Graham. |