perl-css-devel

[css] uri vs. url

[Bjoern H. <der...@gm...>]

Hi,

   CSS::SAC search for uri() functions (for the namespace declaration),
those don't exist in CSS, it's a historical "misnomer", i.e. it's url().
Is this intended? Should I go and fix it in CVS?

regards,
-- 
Björn Höhrmann { mailto:bj...@ho... } http://www.bjoernsworld.de
am Badedeich 7 } Telefon: +49(0)4667/981028 { http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
25899 Dagebüll { PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 } http://www.learn.to/quote/

Re: [css] uri vs. url

[Robin B. <ro...@kn...>]

On Sunday 21 October 2001 18:31, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
>    CSS::SAC search for uri() functions (for the namespace declaration),
> those don't exist in CSS, it's a historical "misnomer", i.e. it's url().
> Is this intended? Should I go and fix it in CVS?

I can find three possible occurences of the problem in the current cvs 
CSS-SAC, on lines 103, 565, and 570. It isn't intended and a previous scan 
actually eliminated a number of these problems.

Note that LexicalUnit.pm has a URI constant. This may or may not be a 
misnomer as well. If it is, then the best thing would probably be to add a 
URL constant, but not to delete the current one (for back-compat). 
TestWriter.pm, Writer.pm may also exhibit similar problems.

Finally, the test file probably has the same problem and should be changed 
accordingly with the code.

Go ahead and patch Bjoern !

-- 
_______________________________________________________________________
Robin Berjon <ro...@kn...> -- CTO
k n o w s c a p e : // venture knowledge agency www.knowscape.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Change is inevitable except from a vending machine.

Re: [css] uri vs. url

[Bjoern H. <der...@gm...>]

* Robin Berjon wrote:

Grmbl, I dunno what Sourceforge people do to their listman, but it's now
IIRC the third time settings get screwed. Could you please take a look
at them and let the listman change the Reply-to header to send replies
only to the list? Thanks.

>On Sunday 21 October 2001 18:31, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
>>    CSS::SAC search for uri() functions (for the namespace declaration),
>> those don't exist in CSS, it's a historical "misnomer", i.e. it's url().
>> Is this intended? Should I go and fix it in CVS?
>
>I can find three possible occurences of the problem in the current cvs 
>CSS-SAC, on lines 103, 565, and 570. It isn't intended and a previous scan 
>actually eliminated a number of these problems.

Three? Oh, yes, the %FUNC_MAP, I'll patch that, too.

>Note that LexicalUnit.pm has a URI constant. This may or may not be a 
>misnomer as well.

URI is fine there, just the function name matters.

>If it is, then the best thing would probably be to add a 
>URL constant, but not to delete the current one (for back-compat). 
>TestWriter.pm, Writer.pm may also exhibit similar problems.

Yes...

>Finally, the test file probably has the same problem and should be changed 
>accordingly with the code.
>
>Go ahead and patch Bjoern !

Done.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann { mailto:bj...@ho... } http://www.bjoernsworld.de
am Badedeich 7 } Telefon: +49(0)4667/981028 { http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
25899 Dagebüll { PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 } http://www.learn.to/quote/

Re: [css] uri vs. url

[Robin B. <ro...@kn...>]

On Sunday 21 October 2001 21:38, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> Grmbl, I dunno what Sourceforge people do to their listman, but it's now
> IIRC the third time settings get screwed. Could you please take a look
> at them and let the listman change the Reply-to header to send replies
> only to the list? Thanks.

I don't know what's going on there. I can't find the option to set Reply-to 
and am under the impression that it might have been removed from mailman.... 
unless of course I dreamt and it never was there. The only option that seems 
to be presently available is to completely hide the actual sender and replace 
it with the list (which seems by far overkill). I'm afraid you're either 
going to have to configure your mailer accordingly (mine has a "this folder 
holds a list" option that remaps the reply keys for instance) or get used to 
reply-to-all. Unless of course someone has deeper knowledge of mailman and 
its web interface than I do.

> >Go ahead and patch Bjoern !
>
> Done.

Thanks :)

-- 
_______________________________________________________________________
Robin Berjon <ro...@kn...> -- CTO
k n o w s c a p e : // venture knowledge agency www.knowscape.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
We are born naked, wet and hungry . Then things get worse. 

Re: [css] uri vs. url

[Bjoern H. <der...@gm...>]

* Robin Berjon wrote:
>On Sunday 21 October 2001 21:38, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
>> Grmbl, I dunno what Sourceforge people do to their listman, but it's now
>> IIRC the third time settings get screwed. Could you please take a look
>> at them and let the listman change the Reply-to header to send replies
>> only to the list? Thanks.
>
>I don't know what's going on there. I can't find the option to set Reply-to 
>and am under the impression that it might have been removed from mailman.... 

I cannot find any option either... grmbl.

>it with the list (which seems by far overkill). I'm afraid you're either 
>going to have to configure your mailer accordingly (mine has a "this folder 
>holds a list" option that remaps the reply keys for instance) or get used to 
>reply-to-all.

Ok, then you get my mails twice. Not my problem :-)

>> >Go ahead and patch Bjoern !
>>
>> Done.
>
>Thanks :)

Yea, I really enjoy patching Björn ;-)
-- 
print just another perl hacker q;s/^\w+_}/ #+--- regards, Björn Höhrmann
;;sub _{reverse split q=:+==>[caller${\1}] #| mailto:bj...@ho...
->[3]};;sub another::just{shift&&join q> > #| http://www.bjoernsworld.de
=>_,@_};package hacker;sub perl{_}$0=~m(_) #+ http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de