From: Bjoern H. <der...@gm...> - 2001-10-25 02:00:59
|
* Robin Berjon wrote: >Yes, and this takes a lot of work to do right (says the guy that tried that >back in the early days of CSS::Parser). But it would be a great win. I think >we can start small (but clean) and try to build on top of that. Yeah! >For the forward compat rules, I don't think that should go into CSS::SAC. Well, at least some higher-level interface to CSS::SAC to get a proper parser if you want to do something CSS Level X specific. >By the way, I'm not sure that CSS::Properties is a good name as we would also >want to deal with @rules and selectors. The former are probably easier, the >latter probably insanely hard :-) But properties is a good place start. I thought CSS::Properties for properties, CSS::Selectors for selectors, etc. if this was not too obvious for you ;-) >> We can make a deal, someone provides a template for the data and I will >> fill that template with data from CSS 1.0, CSS 2.0, SVG 1.0 and >> occasionally CSS Level 3. > >Wow, I admire your courage ! Shouldn't be too hard, I can write a Perl Script to extract data, that's why we are here :-) Prose restricitons and additions will be hard, though. >With sufficient reflexion on the above outlined >schemes, I could provide you with the template. I unfortunately don't have >the time to fill in the data. Just do it for some properties, interesting would be font-family font margin clip vertical-align text-shadow This should cover most of the not too simple cases ;-) -- Björn Höhrmann { mailto:bj...@ho... } http://www.bjoernsworld.de am Badedeich 7 } Telefon: +49(0)4667/981028 { http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de 25899 Dagebüll { PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 } http://www.learn.to/quote/ |