|
From: Bjoern H. <der...@gm...> - 2001-10-25 02:00:59
|
* Robin Berjon wrote:
>Yes, and this takes a lot of work to do right (says the guy that tried that
>back in the early days of CSS::Parser). But it would be a great win. I think
>we can start small (but clean) and try to build on top of that.
Yeah!
>For the forward compat rules, I don't think that should go into CSS::SAC.
Well, at least some higher-level interface to CSS::SAC to get a proper
parser if you want to do something CSS Level X specific.
>By the way, I'm not sure that CSS::Properties is a good name as we would also
>want to deal with @rules and selectors. The former are probably easier, the
>latter probably insanely hard :-) But properties is a good place start.
I thought CSS::Properties for properties, CSS::Selectors for selectors,
etc. if this was not too obvious for you ;-)
>> We can make a deal, someone provides a template for the data and I will
>> fill that template with data from CSS 1.0, CSS 2.0, SVG 1.0 and
>> occasionally CSS Level 3.
>
>Wow, I admire your courage !
Shouldn't be too hard, I can write a Perl Script to extract data, that's
why we are here :-) Prose restricitons and additions will be hard,
though.
>With sufficient reflexion on the above outlined
>schemes, I could provide you with the template. I unfortunately don't have
>the time to fill in the data.
Just do it for some properties, interesting would be
font-family
font
margin
clip
vertical-align
text-shadow
This should cover most of the not too simple cases ;-)
--
Björn Höhrmann { mailto:bj...@ho... } http://www.bjoernsworld.de
am Badedeich 7 } Telefon: +49(0)4667/981028 { http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
25899 Dagebüll { PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 } http://www.learn.to/quote/
|