From: Robin B. <ro...@kn...> - 2001-08-17 14:02:10
|
On Thursday 09 August 2001 11:27, Shlomi Fish wrote: > My problem is that Netscape 4.7 has some CSS bugs, so I hoped I could > write them with CSS and then EnCSS them. Well, guess it would not work. Such an effort was started a year or two ago, and produced a few results.= =20 While not totally useless it is true that it is not the way forward as in= =20 many ways it is better to wait for nn4 to die the atrociously horrible de= ath=20 that it deserves ten times over. Also, it is a lot harder than it seems. = The=20 trivial parts are trivial (eg adding font tags) but the interesting parts= =20 (positioning for instance) are very very hard to get right. I agree with Bj=F6rn that something that worked the other way round would= be=20 very cool (I thought Tidy could do this partially). On the CSS cleanup front there are also cool things to do with SVG. A lot= of=20 the SVG editors out there will produce stupid code where you have hundred= s of=20 path elements in a row all of them with the exact same style attribute. W= hile=20 gzip takes care of the size problem, it'd still be easier to hand edit if= and=20 to read (not to mention that it would produce a much lighter client-side = DOM)=20 if those would be factored out into a CSS class. --=20 _______________________________________________________________________=0D Robin Berjon <ro...@kn...> -- CTO=0D k n o w s c a p e : // venture knowledge agency www.knowscape.com=0D -----------------------------------------------------------------------=0D "What I like about deadlines is the lovely whooshing sound they make =0D as they rush past." =0D --Douglas Adams=0D =0D |