From: Flo G. <fl...@bi...> - 2005-05-31 14:01:13
|
On Tue, 31 May 2005, Yves wrote: > I changed the subject of the thread... > Should this talk move to perfparse-devel or perfparse-devel-int list to avoid the > pollution of perfparse-users ? Yes, moved to devel-int. > >> But constructively: once registered to the wiki, you can unassign the >> modules (boxes) at the left and right bar and then the wiki gets more >> simple looking. With >> http://wiki.perfparse.org/tiki-user_assigned_modules.php >> you then can reassign the modules if you want them back. > > Flo, can you define the default for new users in a way they have the > minimum boxes and don't get confused with useless boxes ? Then they can > add boxes with the preferences. I did unassign some. If you are not logged in, you can see it. I could also break the 3 column design and only use a left "utility" column and a "data area". But i think it is not useful with the shoutbox. But do we need the shoutbox? > > Maybe Keith can also make interesting comments on how to improve tiki-wiki ? > Maybe Keith can also give some help to make a better-looking web site (we have > www.perfparse.org and wiki.perfparse.org : isn't there one useless ? :) > I'm open for all ideas. > Why do some sites based on wikis (the best example I know is wikipedia) > do have a nice look and why does wiki.perfparse.org look like a web > portal ? :) > In fact tikiwiki started as a wiki - with the unique feature of a permission system. That's why i started to develop for tikiwiki. Now i would say it's more a portal based on a wiki (the wiki syntax can be used in many parts of tikiwiki). > Well, this is just my opinion, don't take it as more than my opinion :) > > Yves Feel free. Flo |