From: Ben C. <bcl...@pe...> - 2005-01-04 12:02:44
|
Yves, I kept the original thread in the 'users' mailing list, my thinking being that they are the ones who uss this, and will therefore know. I hope we get some response from them about who still uses this. I my self use the perfparse.sh script on a live server. I do a clean parse every hour, which is the way I want to run that server. I have not upgraded this one for a while, so was unaware of the nagios.lock being taken out of the config. Do you remember which version this was removed? Therefore I would prefer it is supported as-is. It's a nice ability if people want it, although there may be better methods. I also comment on the 'contrib' directory. This contains the create/drops scripts for the database. Which I chose because that's where Nagios puts them, so users may find them more easily. These are supported. Maybe these need another directory? I agree that the perfparse_deamon.sh should go. Ben Yves wrote: > Hi ! > > There are 2 scripts perfparse.sh and perfparse_daemon.sh in the perfparse project. > Are they working ? Are they supported ? Are they obsolete ? Should they be removed ? > > perfparse_daemon.sh > =================== > It's in the contrib/ directory. I consider that everything in contrib/ is unsupported. > We can update things in contrib/ ourselves, but it's like a place to put things that we > don't use and cannot support easily. > > perfparse_daemon.sh was made before perfparsed. Now, we have perfparsed that does better > work than perfparse_daemon.sh and perfparse-log2mysql combined. > I think that perfparse_daemon.sh should be removed, even if it seems to work and to be > up to date :) > It's better to force users who are running perfparse_daemon.sh to use perfparsed. Of > course, they can keep their script if they want. > > perfparse.sh > ============ > > This script contains a reference to nagios lock. For that reason, I consider it as > obsolete. But it is in perfparse/ directory so we have to consider it as supported. A > decision has to be taken here : remove it or update it quick ? :) > > In the doc, perfparse.sh is used in the crontab, to call perfparse-log2* > We now have perfparsed, but perfparsed does not do exactly the same job. > Users who are running perfparse.sh with a "* * * * *" scheduling should use perfparsed. > Users who are running perfparse.sh every 10 minutes or every hour or every day cannot > use perfparsed for that. Those users can run perfparse-log2* with the -c option > (configuration file). Should we provide a script that just does it ? > Decision to be taken : > - do we update perfparse.sh and support it ? > - do we remove perfparse.sh from perfparse ? > - do we update perfparse.sh and move it to contrib/ (in order to say that we don't > support it) ? > > Your opinion... ? > > Yves -- Ben Clewett bcl...@pe... PerfParse http://www.perfparse.org PP FAQ http://wiki.perfparse.org/tiki-list_faqs.php |