From: Yves <yme...@pe...> - 2004-11-29 17:10:15
|
> What structure would you like to see in a wiki/tiki system? > > For my self I would like to see editable specifications of new work we > are going to undertake. Where comments as well as actual changes can b= e > made. Specifications, when there are some. Yes (I'm thinking about the next dat= abase schema for mysql, and API for modules that I will define soon). But don't take them as the reference. The reference is always the code : - create_mysql.sh for mysql database schema (Ben, do you have better idea= than that file ?) - storage.h for storage modules. But I like the idea to have a public draft for specifications. > Yves also mentioned a public FAQ, private edit. Now the software is > gaining in ability, this sounds like an excellent idea. have a look on that : http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/UserFAQ Answering the question at the beginning of this mail, I have 2 suggestion= s : - have one wiki with entries for the main stuff (spec drafts, faq, ...) - have one wiki per main stuff (one for spec drafts, one for faq, ...) I suggest one wiki because we can link some FAQ entries inside our drafts= ? btw, if you don't know what wiki to use, have a look on the wiki that squ= irrelmail uses, and have a look on what wikipedia uses. I don't know which is the best. > Thanks to Tim and Yves for finding and fixing a bug so quickly. Thanks to Tim : he noticed the problem, found the bug, well, yes, that's = me who found the bug, and he found the solution while I was actively searching for it = :) Yves --=20 - Homepage - http://ymettier.free.fr - http://www.logicacmg.com - - GPG key - http://ymettier.free.fr/gpg.txt - - Maitretarot - http://www.nongnu.org/maitretarot/ - - Perfparse - http://perfparse.sf.net/ - |