|
From: Michael T. H. <mi...@ha...> - 2004-10-25 05:22:09
|
James, Thanks for the info. Since posting I've found that the package-included docs are most recent, and the website is somewhat out of date. Confusion cleared up! Michael > > If you are using the latest version, perfparse is now called > perfparse-log2db (or something similar:P). They did a major rewrite > and changed the name to avoid confusion because of the changes in the > way it works... > > If that isn't the solution, you should have some errors from your > compile job that might help to diagnose the problem ;) > > James > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael T. Halligan > To: per...@li... > Sent: 10/22/2004 5:27 PM > Subject: [Perfparse-users] Perfparse binary? > > I'm currently in the process of attempting to install perfparse from > the documentation on the website. My latest snag is the lack of > a perfparse binary. The documentation states that there is a binary > which > parses the performance data log, but this binary doesn't seem to be > created when I make perfparse. I'm not getting any errors during the > compile, and I'm thinking perhaps the docs on the website are just > rather > oudated? > > > ------------------- > BitPusher, LLC > http://www.bitpusher.com/ > 1.888.9PUSHER > (415) 724.7998 - Mobile > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give > us > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out > more > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > _______________________________________________ > Perfparse-users mailing list > Per...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perfparse-users > -- ------------------- BitPusher, LLC http://www.bitpusher.com/ 1.888.9PUSHER (415) 724.7998 - Mobile |